The Internet of Tactical Engagement (IoTE): Acceptability of Data-driven Public Communications in Smart Homes
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Sheffield
Department Name: Law
Abstract
Smart devices are becoming more and more popular in UK households. The fact that they can interact with individuals in their homes, for example by showing a video on a smart TV, displaying an image on a smart assistant, or playing a sound on the smart speaker, makes them the most likely next frontier for organisations to communicate to the public. These messages could potentially be tailored to the audience's demographics or preferences, which is made even more possible with the data collected from users via a widening range of smart devices. Public authorities and civil society organisations are among those who will show potential interest in leveraging these new communicative channels to deliver messages that are of public importance, ranging from public health matters to climate change issues.
While some members of the public will have an interest in receiving these messages via smart devices (or even actively subscribing to some of those organisations), there will be likely concerns around the use of these new technologies, such as privacy, security and agency. At the moment, while there has been emerging research suggesting public concerns about related technologies (for example, online targeting), it is not clear how these concerns may play out in the smart home environment, or under what conditions such practices can be acceptable. Evidence is currently lacking to inform policymaking or production of specific guidelines. Focusing on public communications allows us to explore the potential public interests in personalised smart messaging (unlike commercial advertising, where mostly private interests are involved) while avoiding what has been proved highly sensitive and controversial (such as political microtargeting).
The Internet of Tactical Engagement (IoTE) project will therefore investigate the attitudes of the public towards public authorities and civil society organisations using smart home products to message users. The project will involve stakeholders, including public authorities, civil society organisations and policymakers, to capture their understandings of the current landscape and the prospect of smart engagement. A series of situational scenarios will then be created as a means to engage with the public and to gain insights into their perceptions of these new developments. This will provide the necessary evidence for organisations to consider how to utilise the new technological possibilities in ways acceptable and trustworthy to smart product users, and for policymakers to decide whether further safeguards will be needed in anticipation of this new reality.
While some members of the public will have an interest in receiving these messages via smart devices (or even actively subscribing to some of those organisations), there will be likely concerns around the use of these new technologies, such as privacy, security and agency. At the moment, while there has been emerging research suggesting public concerns about related technologies (for example, online targeting), it is not clear how these concerns may play out in the smart home environment, or under what conditions such practices can be acceptable. Evidence is currently lacking to inform policymaking or production of specific guidelines. Focusing on public communications allows us to explore the potential public interests in personalised smart messaging (unlike commercial advertising, where mostly private interests are involved) while avoiding what has been proved highly sensitive and controversial (such as political microtargeting).
The Internet of Tactical Engagement (IoTE) project will therefore investigate the attitudes of the public towards public authorities and civil society organisations using smart home products to message users. The project will involve stakeholders, including public authorities, civil society organisations and policymakers, to capture their understandings of the current landscape and the prospect of smart engagement. A series of situational scenarios will then be created as a means to engage with the public and to gain insights into their perceptions of these new developments. This will provide the necessary evidence for organisations to consider how to utilise the new technological possibilities in ways acceptable and trustworthy to smart product users, and for policymakers to decide whether further safeguards will be needed in anticipation of this new reality.
Organisations
- University of Sheffield (Lead Research Organisation)
- INFORMATION COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE (Collaboration)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (Collaboration)
- KING'S COLLEGE LONDON (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER (Collaboration)
- University of Bristol (Collaboration)
- University of Amsterdam (Collaboration)
- Horizon Digital Economy Research (Collaboration)
- Ada Lovelace Institute (Collaboration, Project Partner)
- Information Commissioner's Office (Project Partner)
- SPRITE Network Plus (Project Partner)
- Horizon Digital Economy Research (Project Partner)
- REPHRAIN (Project Partner)
Publications
Li Z
(2026)
Accuracy paradox: Addressing epistemic, manipulative, and societal risks of hallucination in AI governance
in Computer Law & Security Review
| Title | Design fiction scenarios of future smart technologies - co-created resources for participatory research and engagement activities |
| Description | These four videos are a series of fictional scenarios depicting possible futures where smart technologies are used for public communications. They are created as a set of resources to facilitate reflections and discussions in participatory research (including for focus groups, interviews, citizen juries, etc.) as well as engagement activities in smart communications. The videos are the result of a co-creation process involving relevant stakeholders, including legal and technical experts, policymakers, regulators and civil society organisations, using the design fiction methodology and covering a range of themes explored in a research workshop.The four scenarios each feature a possible use case of smart technologies (without necessarily representing a prediction of the future): 1. Climate change (preview: https://youtu.be/XDZMPg_N65Q) 2. Public health (preview: https://youtu.be/H3O0Tr-V7DE) 3. Disaster response (preview: https://youtu.be/kQEXfdn0lVg)4. Cybersecurity (preview: https://youtu.be/ACSIo3Bghjw)All videos have been published with a CC BY licence as part of the research project "The Internet of Tactical Engagement (IoTE): Acceptability of Data-driven Public Communications in Smart Homes", funded by the Economic and Social Research Council [ES/Y000020X/1]. The videos have been co-created with the participants of our design fiction events; we would like to thank all participants for their invaluable contribution, including those who have given us permission to acknowledge their inputs: Mariano delli Santi (Open Rights Group), Dr Maria Tzanou (University of Sheffield), DI Dan Giannasi (North West Cyber Resilience Centre), Dr Cigdem Sengul (Brunel University of London), Dr Sana Belguith (University of Bristol), and Dr Arthi Manohar (Brunel University of London). |
| Type Of Art | Film/Video/Animation |
| Year Produced | 2025 |
| Impact | These videos have been used for engagement activities by the research team with relevant stakeholders, including organisations in the industry and members of the general public. They have the potential of being used for further awareness or educational purposes. |
| URL | https://orda.shef.ac.uk/articles/media/Design_fiction_scenarios_of_future_smart_technologies_-_co-cr... |
| Description | Response to ICO call for views on the approach to regulating online advertising |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
| URL | https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.30071098 |
| Description | Response to ICO consultation on draft guidance on consumer Internet of Things products and services |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
| URL | https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.30071083 |
| Description | Response to ICO consultation on updated guidance on storage and access technologies |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Policy Influence Type | Contribution to a national consultation/review |
| URL | https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.30220270 |
| Description | AI UK: Creating an International Ecosystem for Responsible AI Research and Innovation |
| Amount | £30,711,963 (GBP) |
| Funding ID | EP/Y009800/1 |
| Organisation | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) |
| Sector | Public |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Start | 04/2023 |
| End | 03/2028 |
| Description | Ada Lovelace Institute - project partner |
| Organisation | Ada Lovelace Institute |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
| PI Contribution | Providing empirical evidence for future work |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and input |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Horizon Digital Economy Research Institute - project partner |
| Organisation | HORIZON Digital Economy Research |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Intellectual contribution to shaping future research |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and inputs |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | ICO - project partner |
| Organisation | Information Commissioner's Office |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Public |
| PI Contribution | Providing empirical evidence for future work |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and input |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Mr Perry Keller - advisory board |
| Organisation | King's College London |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Intellectual contribution to shaping future research |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and inputs |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Prof. dr. Claes de Vreese - Advisory board |
| Organisation | University of Amsterdam |
| Country | Netherlands |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Intellectual contribution to future research |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and inputs |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Prof. dr. F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius - advisory board |
| Organisation | Radboud University Nijmegen |
| Country | Netherlands |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Intellectual contribution to shaping future research |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and inputs |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | REPHRAIN - project partner |
| Organisation | University of Bristol |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Intellectual contribution to shaping future research |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and inputs |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | SPRITE+ - project partner |
| Organisation | University of Manchester |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Sector | Academic/University |
| PI Contribution | Intellectual contribution to shaping future research |
| Collaborator Contribution | Expertise and inputs |
| Impact | No outputs yet |
| Start Year | 2024 |
| Description | Formal discussion on future collaboration with CREATe stakeholders (Glasgow) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | International |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A formal discussion on future collaboration with CREATe (University Glasgow) and its stakeholders, including Ofcom and CMA, on potential future collaborations |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Project advisory board meeting (online) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Project advisory board meeting, with 11 attendees including representatives from ICO and Ada Lovelace Institute, with formal discussion planning for research activities |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Project stakeholder workshop (London) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Co-created workshop in London with 11 attendees including representatives from DSIT, Ofcom and ORG, with co-creation activities and a formal discussion of potential future colloborations |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2025 |
| Description | REPHRAIN Showcase event (Bristol) |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Presented project at REPHRAIN Showcase event (Bristol), targeting the general public, policymakers and academics, with a discussion on potential impact of the project |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
