Developing methods for understanding mechanism in complex interventions
Lead Research Organisation:
King's College London
Department Name: Biostatistics
Abstract
The general public is exposed through the media to countless claims concerning the efficacy of complex interventions such as psychological therapies for the treatment of depression or other mental health and personal problems. Health service providers are under increasing pressure to increase the availability of interventions such as counselling and psychotherapy. There is clearly a need to design and implement controlled clinical trials to test whether such interventions work.
It is equally clear that research projects need to be carried out that can inform on how the interventions work. Understanding the mechanism by which treatments affect clinical outcomes can help to develop new or improve existing treatments. For example if a treatment has a positive effect on a clinical outcome that is not due to changes in the processes targeted then the mechanism by which this beneficial effect arises can potentially be identified and the therapeutical component driving it enhanced. Similarly if a pathway is identified by which a treatment impacts negatively on a clinical outcome then steps might be undertaken to prevent it.
The proposed research will develop robust and efficient statistical methods for evaluating the mechanisms by which complex interventions operate. It will also help researchers plan trials so that they can establish not only whether but also how treatments work.
It is equally clear that research projects need to be carried out that can inform on how the interventions work. Understanding the mechanism by which treatments affect clinical outcomes can help to develop new or improve existing treatments. For example if a treatment has a positive effect on a clinical outcome that is not due to changes in the processes targeted then the mechanism by which this beneficial effect arises can potentially be identified and the therapeutical component driving it enhanced. Similarly if a pathway is identified by which a treatment impacts negatively on a clinical outcome then steps might be undertaken to prevent it.
The proposed research will develop robust and efficient statistical methods for evaluating the mechanisms by which complex interventions operate. It will also help researchers plan trials so that they can establish not only whether but also how treatments work.
Technical Summary
This is a proposal to develop novel methodology to support the evaluation of complex interventions in particular in mental health research. Although the recognition of the potential role of multiple therapeutic components is integral to the development of the complex intervention the mechanism by which improvements in clinical outcomes are brought about typically remains to be evaluated during the trial phase and the evaluation of putative mediators is a key research objective of an explanatory EME trial. This proposal will further develop causal inference methods for explanatory analyses to provide innovative and more powerful methodology that enables researchers to extract the most accurate information from expensive trials conducted using the latest research designs. In particular we propose to extend statistical and econometric methods to trials collecting factor and/or longitudinal data. We will also develop and implement strategies for efficiently exploiting data provided by series of trials and by trials nested within or complemented by observational data. We will address the statistical challenge of data being missing by design in such series of studies by utilising external calibration samples or data collected as part of the nested design to identify parameters describing mediation processes. We further propose to assess model-averaging as a general approach for combining instrumental variables and Baron and Kenny-type estimators to gain power. Finally, in parallel we will develop guidelines for enhanced design and measurement protocols to enable optimally informative explanatory analyses of trials of complex interventions.
Planned Impact
Provision of Research Methodology
The project will provide research methodology to be employed by those involved in the design and conduct of intervention studies: applied statisticians, research clinicians and researchers/trialists from specific disciplines, e.g. mental health.
Evaluation model for complex interventions
The development of the capability and capacity to implement high-quality clinical research, including the evaluation of complex interventions through randomised trials, is a key priority of the NHS, the NIHR and the MRC. The evaluation of complex treatment programmes for mental illness (such as cognitive remediation therapy for psychosis) is not only a vital component of this research in its own right, but also provides a well-established model for the evaluation of complex interventions in other clinical areas. The present proposal for the development of research methodology for the optimal design, implementation and interpretation of the results of such trials is an essential component of these developments.
Research design
The project will provide guidelines to those planning complex intervention studies to ensure that design and measurement protocols are used that enable the robust and powerful evaluation of treatment effects, as well as the mechanisms by which they are induced.
NHS Policy
The project will investigate the use of nested trial designs whereby a clinical trial is embedded in routine care, and data are available on both the outcomes of the trial as well as measures collected routinely in medical practice. We will provide methods for optimally exploiting such enhanced data sources. We will make recommendations as to which measures need to be collected for subsets of patients to ensure that the mechanism by which treatments operate can be evaluated. Such recommendations will help to construct efficient (electronic) medical records systems that produce high quality essential data and thus can inform on treatment effects in naturalistic settings. Conducting trials embedded in routine care can also lead to efficiency savings and such studies hold more promise in terms of translation to patient benefit in that the additional results gained from the naturalistic component will allow generalisation to routine practice.
Health and Well-being
The general public is exposed through the media to countless claims concerning the efficacy of complex interventions such as psychological therapies. Health service providers are under increasing pressure to increase the availability of therapies. There is clearly a need to design and implement controlled clinical trials to test whether these therapies work. It is equally clear that we need to develop and implement research projects that can tell us how these therapies work and how processes might be manipulated so that therapies can be refined and improved. The project will develop research methodology which will enable researchers to understand treatment effect mechanism and in the longer term lead to better treatments.
Capacity Building
Biostatistics has long been an area of skills shortage. This project will provide training for a young statistician in skills with potential applications spanning medicine, finance, marketing and elsewhere.
The project will provide research methodology to be employed by those involved in the design and conduct of intervention studies: applied statisticians, research clinicians and researchers/trialists from specific disciplines, e.g. mental health.
Evaluation model for complex interventions
The development of the capability and capacity to implement high-quality clinical research, including the evaluation of complex interventions through randomised trials, is a key priority of the NHS, the NIHR and the MRC. The evaluation of complex treatment programmes for mental illness (such as cognitive remediation therapy for psychosis) is not only a vital component of this research in its own right, but also provides a well-established model for the evaluation of complex interventions in other clinical areas. The present proposal for the development of research methodology for the optimal design, implementation and interpretation of the results of such trials is an essential component of these developments.
Research design
The project will provide guidelines to those planning complex intervention studies to ensure that design and measurement protocols are used that enable the robust and powerful evaluation of treatment effects, as well as the mechanisms by which they are induced.
NHS Policy
The project will investigate the use of nested trial designs whereby a clinical trial is embedded in routine care, and data are available on both the outcomes of the trial as well as measures collected routinely in medical practice. We will provide methods for optimally exploiting such enhanced data sources. We will make recommendations as to which measures need to be collected for subsets of patients to ensure that the mechanism by which treatments operate can be evaluated. Such recommendations will help to construct efficient (electronic) medical records systems that produce high quality essential data and thus can inform on treatment effects in naturalistic settings. Conducting trials embedded in routine care can also lead to efficiency savings and such studies hold more promise in terms of translation to patient benefit in that the additional results gained from the naturalistic component will allow generalisation to routine practice.
Health and Well-being
The general public is exposed through the media to countless claims concerning the efficacy of complex interventions such as psychological therapies. Health service providers are under increasing pressure to increase the availability of therapies. There is clearly a need to design and implement controlled clinical trials to test whether these therapies work. It is equally clear that we need to develop and implement research projects that can tell us how these therapies work and how processes might be manipulated so that therapies can be refined and improved. The project will develop research methodology which will enable researchers to understand treatment effect mechanism and in the longer term lead to better treatments.
Capacity Building
Biostatistics has long been an area of skills shortage. This project will provide training for a young statistician in skills with potential applications spanning medicine, finance, marketing and elsewhere.
Publications
Cernis E
(2016)
The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire in Patients with Persecutory Delusions.
in Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy
Chalder T
(2024)
How does cognitive behavior therapy for dissociative seizures work? A mediation analysis of the CODES trial
in Psychological Medicine
Dunn G
(2013)
Integrating biomarker information within trials to evaluate treatment mechanisms and efficacy for personalised medicine.
in Clinical trials (London, England)
Dunn G
(2015)
Evaluation and validation of social and psychological markers in randomised trials of complex interventions in mental health: a methodological research programme.
in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
Ginestet C
(2017)
Dose-response modeling in mental health using stein-like estimators with instrumental variables
in Statistics in Medicine
Ginestet C
(2017)
Stein-like Estimators for Causal Mediation Analysis in Randomized Trials
Ginestet CE
(2020)
Stein-like estimators for causal mediation analysis in randomized trials.
in Statistical methods in medical research
James K
(2022)
Transdiagnostic therapy for persistent physical symptoms: A mediation analysis of the PRINCE secondary trial.
in Behaviour research and therapy
Description | Methodology workshop at Mental Health Research Network national meeting |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Methodology workshop on Randomised Trials of Complex Interventions in Mental Health |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Summer school on Causal Modelling and Evaluation |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Winter school on Causal Modelling and Evaluation |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Assessing Efficacy When Patients Depart From Randomised Treatments at Society for Clinical Trials / ICTMC conference, Liverpool |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Causal Modeling and Evaluation |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Causal Modeling and Evaluation |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Demystifying Causal Inference in Randomised Trials at International Society for Clinical Biostatistics conference, Birmingham |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Demystifying causal inference: Assessing efficacy when patients depart from randomised treatments at PSI conference, Amsterdam |
Geographic Reach | Europe |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Improving the Quality of Efficacy and Mechanisms Evaluation (EME) Studies at North West MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Manchester |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Modern Mediation Analysis in Clinical Trials |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Modern Mediation Analysis in Randomised Trials |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Workshop on Modern Mediation Analysis in Randomised Trials at Society for Clinical Trial conference, Montreal |
Geographic Reach | Multiple continents/international |
Policy Influence Type | Influenced training of practitioners or researchers |
Description | Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme |
Amount | £1,302,928 (GBP) |
Funding ID | 14/23/17 |
Organisation | Medical Research Council (MRC) |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 05/2016 |
End | 05/2019 |
Description | Health Technology Assessment |
Amount | £1,916,262 (GBP) |
Funding ID | 14/68/09 |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 11/2016 |
End | 10/2021 |
Description | NIHR Doctoral Fellowships |
Amount | £257,433 (GBP) |
Funding ID | DRF-2014-07-002 |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2015 |
End | 12/2017 |
Description | Pogramme Grants for Applied Research |
Amount | £2,322,109 (GBP) |
Funding ID | RP-PG-0615-20021 |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 05/2017 |
End | 05/2022 |
Description | Programme Grants for Applied Research |
Amount | £2,883,716 (GBP) |
Funding ID | RP-PG-1214-20009 |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2016 |
End | 09/2021 |
Description | Public Health Research (PHR) Programme |
Amount | £335,000 (GBP) |
Funding ID | 12/3070/04 |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 11/2013 |
End | 10/2015 |
Description | Research for Patient Benefit |
Amount | £148,866 (GBP) |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2015 |
End | 12/2015 |
Description | improving outcomes fro survivors of human trafficking: Evaluating the effectiveness of advocacy interventions in improving mental health and well-being among trafficked people |
Amount | £632,598 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NIHR127593 |
Organisation | Public Heath Research (PHR) Progrmame |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 11/2019 |
End | 10/2022 |
Description | Project on methods for process evaluation in trials. |
Organisation | Government of Singapore |
Country | Singapore |
Sector | Public |
PI Contribution | Supervision of the PhD project. |
Collaborator Contribution | The student is funded by his employer in Singapore and the government to work on this project. |
Impact | Ongoing PhD studentship. |
Start Year | 2016 |
Title | Package Stein-IV - CRAN |
Description | R command SteinIV - Semi-Parametric Stein-Like Estimator with Instrumental Variables. The command accesses routines for computing different types of linear estimators, based on instrumental variables (IVs), including the semi-parametric Stein-like (SPS) estimator, originally introduced by Judge and Mittelhammer (2004). |
Type Of Technology | Software |
Year Produced | 2016 |
Open Source License? | Yes |
Impact | None yet. |
URL | https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SteinIV/index.html |
Description | European Congress of Psychiatry. Madrid |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | 100 plus professional |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Schizophrenia International Research Society, Florence, Italy |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | 100 plus professionals |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2016 |
Description | Visit at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore US-MD 2014 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Talk sparked a number of requests for meetings with post graduate students working on related methodologies but also with mental health professionals interested in applying methods in their own substantive research projects, including the Biostatistics and Research Design Working Group of the Center on Aging and Health (COAH). Investigating possibility of collaborating with Center on Aging and Health (COAH) to analyse Reach II. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2014 |
Description | Workshop at ViCBiostats in Melbourne |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Delivered workshop in Melbourne. Since invited to join grant applications in Australia to NHMRC. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2015 |