Beyond resource allocation formulae: analysing the role of local health authorities and providers in achieving equity in service delivery
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Manchester
Department Name: School of Health Sciences
Abstract
The aim of the fellowship is to acquire the kills to develop and apply an extended framework for the analysis of resource allocation that accounts for how local organizations determine the equitable and efficient use of resources.
The allocation of national health care budgets to local organisations is key to enabling the equitable provision of health care services. "Need weighted capitation formulae" are used in England and elsewhere to allocate resources to local organizations within the National Health Sector (NHS). In the English NHS a £100 billion budget is allocated to local organizations including Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and providers, based on a formula that reflects variations in need determined by age, morbidity, deprivation, and local input prices. Local organizations are responsible for spending their budgets. They are held accountable for performance and spending control, but not for how they distribute it. For example, an organisation serving a very deprived area may get more resources, but not spend them there, as there is no requirement to do so. Thus, the extent to which the aim set by policy makers through the formulae is met varies across local organizations.
The research will study how in a NHS, local health organizations contribute to an equitable and efficient use of financial resources by delivering care to their populations according to need. In particular, I will analyse the effect of different local organizations' characteristics, including how providers are paid, regulated, owned and organised, on the extent to which the distribution of resources matches the need of populations within their catchment area. I will also simulate the distributional effect of alternative budget allocation along with changes in local organization characteristics. I will use a theoretical framework derived from political science and welfare economics, which I will apply using a range of quantitative methods drawn from econometrics, biostatistics, epidemiology and public health. I will use a unique dataset including linked patient records on the use and cost general, acute and mental health care over five years.
The study will focus on England where local organizations are acquiring more autonomy and where linkable individual level administrative data are available. It will improve the understanding of how resources are distributed across patients within CCGs, as a result of the interacting behaviour of local managers, hospitals, GP practices and patients. Results will provide insights for increasing equity and efficiency of healthcare expenditure, in England and elsewhere, through resource allocation and other arrangements, such as incentive design, improving local organizations' performance.
The framework developed and the methods learned and used can be adapted to other settings in future research, and will form the base for the development of a longer term research agenda focusing on additional health policies, in other care settings, including primary care in England, or health systems in low-income countries.
The allocation of national health care budgets to local organisations is key to enabling the equitable provision of health care services. "Need weighted capitation formulae" are used in England and elsewhere to allocate resources to local organizations within the National Health Sector (NHS). In the English NHS a £100 billion budget is allocated to local organizations including Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and providers, based on a formula that reflects variations in need determined by age, morbidity, deprivation, and local input prices. Local organizations are responsible for spending their budgets. They are held accountable for performance and spending control, but not for how they distribute it. For example, an organisation serving a very deprived area may get more resources, but not spend them there, as there is no requirement to do so. Thus, the extent to which the aim set by policy makers through the formulae is met varies across local organizations.
The research will study how in a NHS, local health organizations contribute to an equitable and efficient use of financial resources by delivering care to their populations according to need. In particular, I will analyse the effect of different local organizations' characteristics, including how providers are paid, regulated, owned and organised, on the extent to which the distribution of resources matches the need of populations within their catchment area. I will also simulate the distributional effect of alternative budget allocation along with changes in local organization characteristics. I will use a theoretical framework derived from political science and welfare economics, which I will apply using a range of quantitative methods drawn from econometrics, biostatistics, epidemiology and public health. I will use a unique dataset including linked patient records on the use and cost general, acute and mental health care over five years.
The study will focus on England where local organizations are acquiring more autonomy and where linkable individual level administrative data are available. It will improve the understanding of how resources are distributed across patients within CCGs, as a result of the interacting behaviour of local managers, hospitals, GP practices and patients. Results will provide insights for increasing equity and efficiency of healthcare expenditure, in England and elsewhere, through resource allocation and other arrangements, such as incentive design, improving local organizations' performance.
The framework developed and the methods learned and used can be adapted to other settings in future research, and will form the base for the development of a longer term research agenda focusing on additional health policies, in other care settings, including primary care in England, or health systems in low-income countries.
Technical Summary
The aim of the fellowship is to acquire the kills to develop and apply an extended framework for the analysis of resource allocation that accounts for how local organizations determine the equitable and efficient use of resources.
This proposed research has four specific objectives:
1) To develop a framework to analyse prospectively the distributional consequences of policy scenarios, involving changes in allocation and/or local organizations' policies and characteristics;
2) To assess the extent to which the distribution of health care and expenditure across individuals matches the distribution of need and therefore the equity and efficiency criteria underpinning resource allocation formulae;
3) To determine which factors, including local organizations' policies and characteristics, determine the extent of this match;
4) To simulate the effect of a changes in local organizations' policies and characteristics on the distribution of health care and cost (expenditure) across individuals with different needs.
I will use the definition of need used in the resource allocation formulae in England (cost and use of care predicted assuming no variation in supply). I will make explicit the structural model underlying the reduced form equation used to need and derive the framework for the subsequent analysis. The structural model will build on the work of Fleurbaey and Schokkaert (2009) on the analysis of unfair health inequalities.
I will apply techniques, including benefit incidence analysis, multilevel regression analyses and microsimulations based on structural equations, to individual level linked administrative data covering five years.
In the simulation I will allow local budget allocations and organizations' characteristics amenable to change (how providers are paid, regulated, owned and organised) to vary. Only at the end I will consider the general equilibrium implications of relaxing the assumptions of fixed budget, individual and area level characteristics.
This proposed research has four specific objectives:
1) To develop a framework to analyse prospectively the distributional consequences of policy scenarios, involving changes in allocation and/or local organizations' policies and characteristics;
2) To assess the extent to which the distribution of health care and expenditure across individuals matches the distribution of need and therefore the equity and efficiency criteria underpinning resource allocation formulae;
3) To determine which factors, including local organizations' policies and characteristics, determine the extent of this match;
4) To simulate the effect of a changes in local organizations' policies and characteristics on the distribution of health care and cost (expenditure) across individuals with different needs.
I will use the definition of need used in the resource allocation formulae in England (cost and use of care predicted assuming no variation in supply). I will make explicit the structural model underlying the reduced form equation used to need and derive the framework for the subsequent analysis. The structural model will build on the work of Fleurbaey and Schokkaert (2009) on the analysis of unfair health inequalities.
I will apply techniques, including benefit incidence analysis, multilevel regression analyses and microsimulations based on structural equations, to individual level linked administrative data covering five years.
In the simulation I will allow local budget allocations and organizations' characteristics amenable to change (how providers are paid, regulated, owned and organised) to vary. Only at the end I will consider the general equilibrium implications of relaxing the assumptions of fixed budget, individual and area level characteristics.
Planned Impact
The results of the research will benefit policy makers involved in the decision making on resource allocation in England at national level. Results will provide insights on how to improve or complement resource formulae currently used to allocate budget to local organizations to account for differences in the way resources are allocated across individuals by local organizations.
I will reach policy makers at the national level through the collaboration with NHS Engand Insights for Finance, Allocation team. The team will support me in engaging with the relevant NHS teams and bodies. Ideas and insights will be directly relevant to allocations, they will be considered as an alternative and the corresponding scenario discussed. Through the allocation team I will also attend and present results to the Advisory Committee for Resource Allocation. While based at York I will be part of the Health Policy group and be in contact with the Fast Response Analytical Facility, funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme and involving researchers at the University of York and the King's Fund. It aims at providing expert advice, policy briefings and empirical and theoretical analysis directly to the Department of Health.
The results will also benefit policy makers at the local level, as they will provide insights on the local incentives and organizations' characteristics that facilitate a more equitable distribution of resources within local organizations' catchment areas. These will be directly relevant for Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), that I will reach through meetings, presentations and other opportunities for engagement. Tarryn Lake, as a member of the advisory committee, will support me in identifying opportunities for engagement and dissemination, as well as relevant conferences such as the ones of NHS Commissioners and NHS Providers. Tarryn is Chief Financial Officer of Sunderland CCG, Treasurer of the Healthcare Financial Management Association northern branch and member of the Advisory Committee for Resource Allocation and has a long-standing involvement in commissioning and resource allocation issues.
The research will offer a tool to monitor equity in resource allocation within CCGs that will also allow assessing progresses against the benchmark set by the formulae. A specific indicator could be added to the CCG outcome tools and incentives attached to performance improvements.
Through colleagues at the University of Manchester I will engage with the Great Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership. The research will offer a tool to simulate and monitor the distributional impact of alternative policies, as well as insights on which organizational arrangements have proven more effective in redistributing care and resources according to need.
Results will benefit policymakers outside England as insights may apply across settings. I will present results at conferences such as the HSG symposium usually attended by a mix of researchers and policy makers also attend. I will produce a policy brief illustrating the lesson learned that are relevant to other countries and I will circulate it through colleagues, for example at EQUINET (health equity network in Sub-Saharan Africa) and WHO South-East Asia health financing team and write a blog and newsletter IHP. Results and policy briefs will also be made available on the Equipol website. Dr Jo Borghi (LHSTM), as an advisor, will also help ensuring that opportunities for cross learning across settings are maximised.
Patient involvement activities will be developed and funded through other sources.
I will reach policy makers at the national level through the collaboration with NHS Engand Insights for Finance, Allocation team. The team will support me in engaging with the relevant NHS teams and bodies. Ideas and insights will be directly relevant to allocations, they will be considered as an alternative and the corresponding scenario discussed. Through the allocation team I will also attend and present results to the Advisory Committee for Resource Allocation. While based at York I will be part of the Health Policy group and be in contact with the Fast Response Analytical Facility, funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme and involving researchers at the University of York and the King's Fund. It aims at providing expert advice, policy briefings and empirical and theoretical analysis directly to the Department of Health.
The results will also benefit policy makers at the local level, as they will provide insights on the local incentives and organizations' characteristics that facilitate a more equitable distribution of resources within local organizations' catchment areas. These will be directly relevant for Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), that I will reach through meetings, presentations and other opportunities for engagement. Tarryn Lake, as a member of the advisory committee, will support me in identifying opportunities for engagement and dissemination, as well as relevant conferences such as the ones of NHS Commissioners and NHS Providers. Tarryn is Chief Financial Officer of Sunderland CCG, Treasurer of the Healthcare Financial Management Association northern branch and member of the Advisory Committee for Resource Allocation and has a long-standing involvement in commissioning and resource allocation issues.
The research will offer a tool to monitor equity in resource allocation within CCGs that will also allow assessing progresses against the benchmark set by the formulae. A specific indicator could be added to the CCG outcome tools and incentives attached to performance improvements.
Through colleagues at the University of Manchester I will engage with the Great Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership. The research will offer a tool to simulate and monitor the distributional impact of alternative policies, as well as insights on which organizational arrangements have proven more effective in redistributing care and resources according to need.
Results will benefit policymakers outside England as insights may apply across settings. I will present results at conferences such as the HSG symposium usually attended by a mix of researchers and policy makers also attend. I will produce a policy brief illustrating the lesson learned that are relevant to other countries and I will circulate it through colleagues, for example at EQUINET (health equity network in Sub-Saharan Africa) and WHO South-East Asia health financing team and write a blog and newsletter IHP. Results and policy briefs will also be made available on the Equipol website. Dr Jo Borghi (LHSTM), as an advisor, will also help ensuring that opportunities for cross learning across settings are maximised.
Patient involvement activities will be developed and funded through other sources.
People |
ORCID iD |
Laura Anselmi (Principal Investigator / Fellow) |
Publications
Anselmi L
(2023)
The impact of performance-based financing within local health systems: Evidence from Mozambique.
in Health economics
Anselmi L
(2020)
Pay for Performance: A Reflection on How a Global Perspective Could Enhance Policy and Research.
in International journal of health policy and management
Anselmi L
(2021)
Use of past care markers in risk-adjustment: accounting for systematic differences across providers
in The European Journal of Health Economics
Britteon P
(2022)
The effect of devolution on health: a generalised synthetic control analysis of Greater Manchester, England.
in The Lancet. Public health
Britteon P
(2024)
The impact of devolution on local health systems: Evidence from Greater Manchester, England.
in Social science & medicine (1982)
Fatimah A
(2023)
Evaluating whole system reforms: A structured approach for selecting multiple outcomes.
in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Fernandes Q
(2022)
Maternal and Child Health Care Service Disruptions and Recovery in Mozambique After Cyclone Idai: An Uncontrolled Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
in Global health, science and practice
Fichera E
(2021)
Can Results-Based Financing improve health outcomes in resource poor settings? Evidence from Zimbabwe.
in Social science & medicine (1982)
Kovacs R
(2022)
Who is paid in pay-for-performance? Inequalities in the distribution of financial bonuses amongst health centres in Zimbabwe.
in Health policy and planning
Description | Membership in Technical Advisory Group to NHS Resource Allocation |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Impact | This is a new role |
URL | https://www.england.nhs.uk/allocations/ |
Description | Membership of Health Inequalities Task and Finish Group - NHS England |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
Impact | The group is reviewing the methodology relative to the component of the health inequality adjustment which is part of the national formula for NHS resource allocation. |
Description | Partecipate into NHS Englang working group oh Health Inequalities that has the objective of monitor activities implemented to reduce health inequalities locally by Clinical Commissioning Groups (local health administrations) |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Membership of a guideline committee |
Impact | This working group is in charge of monitoring actions that local health organisations (Clinical Commissioning Groups) are taking to improve inequalities within their areas. The objective is to understand and incentivise good practices in the use of the specific health inequalitie sbudget that Clinical Commissioning Groups are allocated. |
Description | NIHR HS&DR Funding Opportunity Unmet need in health and social care Call 19/65, Project title "Accounting for Unmet Need in Equitable Healthcare Resource Allocation", Host Organisation University of Liverpool |
Organisation | London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London) |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | This is a project funded by NIHR and led by Prof. Ben Barr at the University of Liverpool. Myself and Prof. Sutton designed will lead one of the four work packages, as well as contributing to the overall project. The proposal was submitted in September 2019 and the project started on 1st March 2020 I partecipated in this project because of this SDF Fellowship |
Collaborator Contribution | Partners in the collaboration will lead the project and the remaining 3 workpackages. |
Impact | No output yet as the project started on 1st March 2021 |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | NIHR HS&DR Funding Opportunity Unmet need in health and social care Call 19/65, Project title "Accounting for Unmet Need in Equitable Healthcare Resource Allocation", Host Organisation University of Liverpool |
Organisation | University of Liverpool |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | This is a project funded by NIHR and led by Prof. Ben Barr at the University of Liverpool. Myself and Prof. Sutton designed will lead one of the four work packages, as well as contributing to the overall project. The proposal was submitted in September 2019 and the project started on 1st March 2020 I partecipated in this project because of this SDF Fellowship |
Collaborator Contribution | Partners in the collaboration will lead the project and the remaining 3 workpackages. |
Impact | No output yet as the project started on 1st March 2021 |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | NIHR HS&DR Funding Opportunity Unmet need in health and social care Call 19/65, Project title "Accounting for Unmet Need in Equitable Healthcare Resource Allocation", Host Organisation University of Liverpool |
Organisation | University of York |
Department | Centre for Health Economics (CHE) |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | This is a project funded by NIHR and led by Prof. Ben Barr at the University of Liverpool. Myself and Prof. Sutton designed will lead one of the four work packages, as well as contributing to the overall project. The proposal was submitted in September 2019 and the project started on 1st March 2020 I partecipated in this project because of this SDF Fellowship |
Collaborator Contribution | Partners in the collaboration will lead the project and the remaining 3 workpackages. |
Impact | No output yet as the project started on 1st March 2021 |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | Participation in NIHR Global Health Research Group on Sustainable Care for Anxiety and Depression in Indonesia |
Organisation | Universitas Indonesia |
Country | Indonesia |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Developed the proposal for analysis of equitable access and equitable funding distribution |
Collaborator Contribution | No direct contribution to this award |
Impact | No output yet |
Start Year | 2020 |
Description | Participation into EQUIPOL |
Organisation | University of York |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | EQUIPOL (The Equity in Health Policy Research Group) is an inter-disciplinary group of researchers based at the University of York, with collaborators around the world. The aim is to develop and apply methods for analysing policy impacts on the health of different population groups, with the aim of helping policy makers use evidence to reduce unfair health inequalities. |
Collaborator Contribution | The research group organises yearly meetings where researchers working on related projects may present their work. This is to create a platform for researchers to interact and start new collaborations. I (LA) have been attending these meetings and will present work and interact with researchers working in similar areas. |
Impact | Participation into meetings and linkages with wider multidisciplinary research group. |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | Supporting the spread of effective integration models for older people living in care homes: A mixed method approach |
Organisation | University of Manchester |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | National Institute for Health Research project 349,894.00 GBP Exp. start date 01/03/2021 Exp. end date 28/02/2023 |
Collaborator Contribution | NA |
Impact | not yet |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | Presentations of metrics for monitoring healthcare equity within CCG with NHS England and Improvements Allocations |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Presentations of metrics for monitoring healthcare equity within CCG with NHS England and Improvements Allocations. There was interest around the results and a request to continue work to understand what would explain differences. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
Description | Workshop on Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) Resource Allocation: National and Local Developments |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | The workshop took place on 17 November 2022. This was one day workshop with 70 participants including representatives from over 20 (out of 42) NHS Integrated Care Boards from across England and researchers to discuss methods and challenges related to the allocation of NHS funding within newly constituted Integrated Care Boards. We reviewed currents methods for allocating budgets to Integrated Care Boards, discussed related research on methodological development and on allocations within rather than between Integrated Care Boards, and discussed the challenges experienced locally by Directors of Finance. There was request for follow-up activities and further discussion. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | Workshop with representatives from CCGs |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | This workshop was organised in the context of a related project with the objective of discussing a proposed adjustment for unmet need to resource allocation formulae based on measures of responsiveness of healthcare use to need within local health organisations, namely CCGs. The proposed adjustment and the measure of responsiveness which underpins it were presented. The discussion around differences in how CCGs were able to meet needs and how these could be measured and explained was informed by work undertaken for this grant. There were 9 attendants from different CCGs, which engaged in the discussion and requested opportunities for further engagements and the development of metrics and tools for their local organisation. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |