Impact of socioeconomic circumstances on risks and life-course consequences of preterm birth: studies into differential exposure and susceptibility
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Liverpool
Department Name: Institute of Psychology Health & Society
Abstract
Relevance:
Preterm birth is a significant public health problem. Affecting almost one in ten births, children born preterm are significantly more likely to face developmental problems, health and behavioural issues, and poorer educational outcomes. Preterm birth is a leading cause of mortality, morbidity and healthcare use among children globally, and to further exacerbate the issue, pregnant women who are of a lower socioeconomic status are significantly more likely to give birth preterm than more affluent women. Considering that health and educational outcomes are worse for children who grow up more disadvantaged socioeconomic conditions, and they are more likely to be born preterm, it evident that preterm birth is an important contributor to the generation of health inequalities.
Reducing health inequalities is a key area of policy interest. However, there are currently no policies or interventions to support children born preterm in the UK beyond the health services they may require. Children born preterm have worse outcomes even when they do not have an early life health problem. Thus, there is a cohort of children that needs support but do not receive it. A challenge for this situation is that we do not fully understand the complex pathways from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth, or the relationships between preterm birth and childhood socioeconomic conditions, and their influence on outcomes in later life. This limits the ability to intervene effectively through policy action.
Hypotheses:
This research is founded on two hypotheses. First, we can better explain inequalities in the distribution of preterm birth through understanding of how maternal risk factors, such as maternal behaviours (smoking while pregnant), or maternal health status, influence the pathway from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth. Second is that the impacts that preterm birth have on later life health and education outcomes is dependent on the childhood socioeconomic circumstances.
Aims:
To test my hypotheses, I have three aims for this research:
- Identify the complex pathways that lead to inequalities in the distribution of preterm birth.
- Understand how preterm birth and childhood socioeconomic conditions interact to lead to inequalities in later life.
- Evaluate the potential impact of policies and interventions at these two policy entry points on health inequalities in later life.
To do this, I will use two rich UK datasets. The UK Millennium Cohort Study is a large follow-up study of children from birth, between 2000 and 2001, through to age seventeen. The SAIL databank is a world leading data linkage capturing data on the entire population of Wales covering health, education and social circumstances. I will apply state of the art statistical techniques to these data to meet my aims.
Outcomes and Benefits:
My research will increase understanding of pathways to inequalities in preterm birth, and how preterm birth interacts with socioeconomic conditions to influence later life inequalities. It will identify children who are most at risk of negative later life outcomes related to preterm birth and socioeconomic conditions. It will also show the potential benefits of intervening at select policy points associated with preterm birth on reducing inequalities in later life. I will work with local policymakers and clinicians to ensure this research is translated into effective action to reduce the negative impacts of preterm birth. The knowledge generated by my research has the potential to reduce inequalities, improve the health of the population, and have wider social and economic benefits.
Preterm birth is a significant public health problem. Affecting almost one in ten births, children born preterm are significantly more likely to face developmental problems, health and behavioural issues, and poorer educational outcomes. Preterm birth is a leading cause of mortality, morbidity and healthcare use among children globally, and to further exacerbate the issue, pregnant women who are of a lower socioeconomic status are significantly more likely to give birth preterm than more affluent women. Considering that health and educational outcomes are worse for children who grow up more disadvantaged socioeconomic conditions, and they are more likely to be born preterm, it evident that preterm birth is an important contributor to the generation of health inequalities.
Reducing health inequalities is a key area of policy interest. However, there are currently no policies or interventions to support children born preterm in the UK beyond the health services they may require. Children born preterm have worse outcomes even when they do not have an early life health problem. Thus, there is a cohort of children that needs support but do not receive it. A challenge for this situation is that we do not fully understand the complex pathways from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth, or the relationships between preterm birth and childhood socioeconomic conditions, and their influence on outcomes in later life. This limits the ability to intervene effectively through policy action.
Hypotheses:
This research is founded on two hypotheses. First, we can better explain inequalities in the distribution of preterm birth through understanding of how maternal risk factors, such as maternal behaviours (smoking while pregnant), or maternal health status, influence the pathway from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth. Second is that the impacts that preterm birth have on later life health and education outcomes is dependent on the childhood socioeconomic circumstances.
Aims:
To test my hypotheses, I have three aims for this research:
- Identify the complex pathways that lead to inequalities in the distribution of preterm birth.
- Understand how preterm birth and childhood socioeconomic conditions interact to lead to inequalities in later life.
- Evaluate the potential impact of policies and interventions at these two policy entry points on health inequalities in later life.
To do this, I will use two rich UK datasets. The UK Millennium Cohort Study is a large follow-up study of children from birth, between 2000 and 2001, through to age seventeen. The SAIL databank is a world leading data linkage capturing data on the entire population of Wales covering health, education and social circumstances. I will apply state of the art statistical techniques to these data to meet my aims.
Outcomes and Benefits:
My research will increase understanding of pathways to inequalities in preterm birth, and how preterm birth interacts with socioeconomic conditions to influence later life inequalities. It will identify children who are most at risk of negative later life outcomes related to preterm birth and socioeconomic conditions. It will also show the potential benefits of intervening at select policy points associated with preterm birth on reducing inequalities in later life. I will work with local policymakers and clinicians to ensure this research is translated into effective action to reduce the negative impacts of preterm birth. The knowledge generated by my research has the potential to reduce inequalities, improve the health of the population, and have wider social and economic benefits.
Technical Summary
Aims
To identify the causal pathways from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth. To explain and quantify the interaction between preterm birth and socioeconomic conditions on later life health and educational inequalities. To evaluate the potential effectiveness of policy or intervention on reducing inequalities in preterm birth prevalence and health and educational outcomes in later life. Three research questions have been identified:
1- How do key exposures, such as maternal health and behaviours, mediate the pathway from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth?
2- How does preterm birth influence the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and adolescent outcomes for health and education?
3- What is the effect of interventions to improve birth outcomes, and outcomes for children born preterm, on later life inequalities associated with socioeconomic circumstances?
Methods
Secondary analysis of data sources: Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) and the Welsh SAIL databank. The MCS is a birth cohort of almost 19,000 children born in the UK in 2000/01. The SAIL databank is a collection of anonymously linked data across Wales, including birth extracts, health data from primary and secondary care, and educational data. Analysis will be through causal mediation analysis, fourfold decomposition analysis to separate mediated and interactive effects, and simulation of intervention effects. Outcomes will be measured using mortality and morbidity measures (e.g. ICD10 diagnosis), healthcare usage and exam results at Key Stage 3, GCSE and A-Level.
Scientific and Medical Opportunities
Results will be used to inform policymakers, and Obstetric and Paediatric clinicians of potential intervention points to reduce preterm birth burden, and identify a particularly at risk cohort of children who are currently not supported by policy or intervention in the UK. The results will demonstrate the potential benefits of intervention on later life outcomes.
To identify the causal pathways from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth. To explain and quantify the interaction between preterm birth and socioeconomic conditions on later life health and educational inequalities. To evaluate the potential effectiveness of policy or intervention on reducing inequalities in preterm birth prevalence and health and educational outcomes in later life. Three research questions have been identified:
1- How do key exposures, such as maternal health and behaviours, mediate the pathway from maternal socioeconomic status to preterm birth?
2- How does preterm birth influence the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and adolescent outcomes for health and education?
3- What is the effect of interventions to improve birth outcomes, and outcomes for children born preterm, on later life inequalities associated with socioeconomic circumstances?
Methods
Secondary analysis of data sources: Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) and the Welsh SAIL databank. The MCS is a birth cohort of almost 19,000 children born in the UK in 2000/01. The SAIL databank is a collection of anonymously linked data across Wales, including birth extracts, health data from primary and secondary care, and educational data. Analysis will be through causal mediation analysis, fourfold decomposition analysis to separate mediated and interactive effects, and simulation of intervention effects. Outcomes will be measured using mortality and morbidity measures (e.g. ICD10 diagnosis), healthcare usage and exam results at Key Stage 3, GCSE and A-Level.
Scientific and Medical Opportunities
Results will be used to inform policymakers, and Obstetric and Paediatric clinicians of potential intervention points to reduce preterm birth burden, and identify a particularly at risk cohort of children who are currently not supported by policy or intervention in the UK. The results will demonstrate the potential benefits of intervention on later life outcomes.
Planned Impact
My proposed research will have impact on a number of groups beyond the academic beneficiaries detailed above:
- Children: Almost one in ten children are born preterm in the UK, and there is an inequalities distribution across the socioeconomic gradient; women from a more disadvantaged background are significantly more likely to give birth preterm. Children born preterm are at significantly increased risk for negative health and educational outcomes. My research will identify the interventions that are likely to prevent preterm birth amongst more disadvantaged children and support better educational and health outcomes for disadvantaged children who are born preterm. By the end of the project (three years) evidence will be produced that support effective spending on interventions for children to improve their later life outcomes. This has considerable potential to reduce the burden of preterm birth for many families.
- Health Service: Obstetricians, paediatrics, commissioners and managers all stand to benefit from my research. The research aims to identify factors which influence the prevalence of preterm birth, and the factors which influence healthcare use, health and educational outcomes for children born preterm. This evidence can be used by health service commissioning and planning to improve equity by identifying children with the most need and ensuring availability of, and access to, appropriate services. Reducing health inequalities and inequalities in access to services has been identified as a key aim for the NHS, in the Five Year Forward View, and for Public Health England.
- Policymakers at a local and national setting: By identifying the effects of preterm birth on later life outcomes in health and education, particularly for preterm births without associated health problems, my research will provide evidence for policymakers, demonstrating areas of unmet need and identifying the most effective approach for investment. Through dissemination of this evidence throughout the project, policymakers may be able to use this to lobby politically for increased children's spending in these areas. The research on intervention effects can be used by policymakers at a local level to maximise the impact from their children's spending, which will be important during times of reduced funding.
- Education and Social Care sectors: Similar to the health service, my research will support schools and social care workers in identifying children most in need, and implementing interventions which maximise benefit in a resource-scarce setting. The research will assess educational outcomes, assess the impact of institutional factors (e.g. schools) and assess the influence of social factors on causal pathways, and is therefore highly relevant to these sectors.
- Wider public: There is a potential wider impact that may be achieved through my research. First, there are future economic benefits by maximising the potential for children born preterm to thrive through increased educational attainment, increased potential for employment and reduced need for welfare support. Secondly, reducing health inequalities, and improving health, for children born preterm will lead to reduced healthcare pressures on adult health services. Finally, this research will provide evidence for the hypothesis that social conditions interact with health events to create a differential susceptibility to inequalities. This will be of significance for people with a long-term condition or disability - potentially, there is a differential susceptibility for these groups which provides opportunity for effective intervention.
- Children: Almost one in ten children are born preterm in the UK, and there is an inequalities distribution across the socioeconomic gradient; women from a more disadvantaged background are significantly more likely to give birth preterm. Children born preterm are at significantly increased risk for negative health and educational outcomes. My research will identify the interventions that are likely to prevent preterm birth amongst more disadvantaged children and support better educational and health outcomes for disadvantaged children who are born preterm. By the end of the project (three years) evidence will be produced that support effective spending on interventions for children to improve their later life outcomes. This has considerable potential to reduce the burden of preterm birth for many families.
- Health Service: Obstetricians, paediatrics, commissioners and managers all stand to benefit from my research. The research aims to identify factors which influence the prevalence of preterm birth, and the factors which influence healthcare use, health and educational outcomes for children born preterm. This evidence can be used by health service commissioning and planning to improve equity by identifying children with the most need and ensuring availability of, and access to, appropriate services. Reducing health inequalities and inequalities in access to services has been identified as a key aim for the NHS, in the Five Year Forward View, and for Public Health England.
- Policymakers at a local and national setting: By identifying the effects of preterm birth on later life outcomes in health and education, particularly for preterm births without associated health problems, my research will provide evidence for policymakers, demonstrating areas of unmet need and identifying the most effective approach for investment. Through dissemination of this evidence throughout the project, policymakers may be able to use this to lobby politically for increased children's spending in these areas. The research on intervention effects can be used by policymakers at a local level to maximise the impact from their children's spending, which will be important during times of reduced funding.
- Education and Social Care sectors: Similar to the health service, my research will support schools and social care workers in identifying children most in need, and implementing interventions which maximise benefit in a resource-scarce setting. The research will assess educational outcomes, assess the impact of institutional factors (e.g. schools) and assess the influence of social factors on causal pathways, and is therefore highly relevant to these sectors.
- Wider public: There is a potential wider impact that may be achieved through my research. First, there are future economic benefits by maximising the potential for children born preterm to thrive through increased educational attainment, increased potential for employment and reduced need for welfare support. Secondly, reducing health inequalities, and improving health, for children born preterm will lead to reduced healthcare pressures on adult health services. Finally, this research will provide evidence for the hypothesis that social conditions interact with health events to create a differential susceptibility to inequalities. This will be of significance for people with a long-term condition or disability - potentially, there is a differential susceptibility for these groups which provides opportunity for effective intervention.
People |
ORCID iD |
Philip McHale (Principal Investigator / Fellow) |
Publications
Mason KE
(2021)
Age-Adjusted Associations Between Comorbidity and Outcomes of COVID-19: A Review of the Evidence From the Early Stages of the Pandemic.
in Frontiers in public health
McHale P
(2022)
Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review.
in BMC public health
McHale P
(2024)
How are socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth explained by maternal smoking and maternal body mass index: A mediation analysis
in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Description | RESTORE - Research for Equitable SySTem RespOnse and REcovery |
Amount | £538,556 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NIHR202484 |
Organisation | National Institute for Health Research |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 05/2021 |
End | 05/2023 |
Description | Rapid reviews on patient pathways to pregnancy outcomes: the role of medical devices |
Amount | £20,200 (GBP) |
Organisation | Government of the UK |
Department | Department of Health and Social Care |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 06/2022 |
End | 08/2022 |
Description | Attending Better Start Group at Liverpool City Council |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | The Liverpool City Council 'Better Start Group' aim to maximise the opportunities to improve health, social educational and emotional outcomes for all babies, infants and children (0-5) and to ensure they have the best start in life, developing into happy children who grow and learn to their full potential. I have attended this group, offering information on maximising the use of data available to us, and insights from my research. Plan to present findings at future meetings |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
Description | Child-friendly cities |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | I am currently sitting on the University and academic group for supporting the Child Freindly City (CFC) programme in Liverpool from a University perspective. CFC is a UN initiative for any system of local governance committed to improving the lives of children within their jurisdiction by realizing their rights as articulated in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Liverpool was accepted onto the programme in 2019. The group plans to organise events and support a rights based approach through knowledge sharing. We can use existing links with the local government and healthcare system to support changes in these organisations for the Child of the North recommendations and advocate for a rights-based approach. This work is ongoing |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021,2022 |
Description | Join the Better Start Group and attended Healthy Children and Families Segment launch |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | I attended the Healthy Child and Families Segment as representation for the University of Liverpool. This group includes health, LA and academia and others. The aim of this is to work across local policy to inform and improve the outcomes for children and families. The better start group is a subgroup of this segment. My role in this has been to provide expertise on this from an academic perspective. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022,2023 |
Description | Leading evidence submission on Health Assessments for Benefits |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | Led on the evidence submission on Health Assessments for Benefits. This resulted in an oral presentation at a session by the department. My role was to lead the development of the written evidence and help the preparation for the oral evidence. The overall outcome was to inform recommendations from the committee |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
URL | https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/40716/html/ |
Description | Presentation about preterm birth at Chesire and Merseyside Baby Week |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Presentation about preterm birth, inequalities and my research to a session titled "Addressing Health Inequalities before they start!". This was followed by a presentation by a local paediatrician then followed by a conversation with the audience about inequalities in early life and what this means for local area |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
Description | Presentation to the Liverpool Women's Hospital Future Generation event |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Presentation to future planning at the local women's hospital. This involved discussing the demographics of births during 19/20, inequalities in risks and outcomes. Once presented, I participated in the neonatal session which was focussed on emergency care. The aim of this event was to identify planning needs for obstetrics healthcare in Liverpool - This presentation focussed on inequalities in preterm birth and I used the data I am using in my fellowship. I conducted the descriptive analysis, using the regression approaches defined in my fellowship and presented the results. - This presentation was well received and formed part of the discussions that happened afterward. I was able to ensure inequalities were considered in considering future maternity planning, and highlighted the importance of potential risk factors. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
Description | Supporting evidence submission on Child Poverty |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
Results and Impact | I supported our evidence submission to UK Parliament committee about 'Children in poverty: Measurement and targets'. This resulted in an oral presentation at a session by the department. My role was to support development of the written evidence and help the preparation for the oral evidence. The overall outcome was to inform recommendations from the committee |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
URL | https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/23214/default/ |