Investigating the role of epigenetic remodelling in glioblastoma in response to therapy
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Leeds
Department Name: School of Medicine
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and most deadly form of brain cancer. GBM tumours are solid but many of the cancer cells break away and invade the surrounding normal brain tissue, making complete surgical removal impossible. After surgery, patients commonly receive radio- and chemo-therapy but GBM tumours typically grow back within 6 to 9 months and are fatal. This is why brain tumours kill more people aged under 40 than any other cancer.
New drugs that were developed to target the DNA mutations that are commonly found in GBM tumours have failed to increase patient survival. It is now thought that this is because, although such mutations may have caused the tumour to form, they are not responsible for its continued growth and ability to resist treatment. To specifically identify what properties of GBM cancer cells do enable them to resist treatment, I have collected, characterised and compared paired GBM tumours from multiple patients i.e. the first tumour that was diagnosed and removed and the post-treatment recurrent tumour from cases where the latter also underwent surgery. I have found that a specific set of genes are universally altered in GBM by treatment, but whether they become more switched on or more switched off after therapy is patient dependent and enables them to be split into two classes. I will determine whether assignment to one class versus another alters the likely survival for GBM patients or can be used to better predict the likely benefit of treatment with one type of therapy versus another.
Furthermore, if the changes that I have observed in the specific genes are actually required by the GBM cells in order for them to survive treatment, then developing drugs to inhibit the changes may provide a more effective treatment for GBM. I plan to use my fellowship to test just that. I will use both computational analysis of patient datasets to reveal the biology underpinning the observed gene changes and further profiling of GBM tumour pairs to confirm whether the changes are driven by a single master regulator protein. I will then grow GBM tumours in the laboratory and use experimental approaches to stop them being able to undergo the observed changes, before administering the same radio- and chemo-therapy that patients receive to see if more cells die versus tumours where the changes are allowed to take place. Finally, I will determine whether drugs can be adapted or developed that restrict the gene changes in patients, making their GBM tumours more susceptible to killing as part of more effective treatment strategies.
New drugs that were developed to target the DNA mutations that are commonly found in GBM tumours have failed to increase patient survival. It is now thought that this is because, although such mutations may have caused the tumour to form, they are not responsible for its continued growth and ability to resist treatment. To specifically identify what properties of GBM cancer cells do enable them to resist treatment, I have collected, characterised and compared paired GBM tumours from multiple patients i.e. the first tumour that was diagnosed and removed and the post-treatment recurrent tumour from cases where the latter also underwent surgery. I have found that a specific set of genes are universally altered in GBM by treatment, but whether they become more switched on or more switched off after therapy is patient dependent and enables them to be split into two classes. I will determine whether assignment to one class versus another alters the likely survival for GBM patients or can be used to better predict the likely benefit of treatment with one type of therapy versus another.
Furthermore, if the changes that I have observed in the specific genes are actually required by the GBM cells in order for them to survive treatment, then developing drugs to inhibit the changes may provide a more effective treatment for GBM. I plan to use my fellowship to test just that. I will use both computational analysis of patient datasets to reveal the biology underpinning the observed gene changes and further profiling of GBM tumour pairs to confirm whether the changes are driven by a single master regulator protein. I will then grow GBM tumours in the laboratory and use experimental approaches to stop them being able to undergo the observed changes, before administering the same radio- and chemo-therapy that patients receive to see if more cells die versus tumours where the changes are allowed to take place. Finally, I will determine whether drugs can be adapted or developed that restrict the gene changes in patients, making their GBM tumours more susceptible to killing as part of more effective treatment strategies.
Planned Impact
There are currently no effective treatment options for glioblastoma (GBM) brain tumours. Standard treatment consists of surgery, radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ), but recurrence is inevitable. I will explore a new avenue of research into personalised medicine for more effective treatment of GBM. This will result in two main possible outputs with impact on non-academic stakeholders:
1. A biomarker that stratifies primary GBM patients into two classes with different survival or response to specific treatments. This would be a candidate for inclusion in clinical practice as a diagnostic test used by clinicians to manage patient expectations of life-expectancy and help them to advise on treatment options in relation to likely increased survival vs risk to quality of life. TIMING: 5-10 years
2. Novel, more effective, therapeutic strategies for treating GBM. TIMING: 7-15 years
The following groups will be affected by these outputs, and other aspects of the funded research as a whole:
A. Patients and the public: More accurate prognosis of primary GBM tumours will better inform patients on the likely progression of their disease and help them and their families to cope and prepare. It may also avoid unnecessarily debilitating treatments in cases where there is a little chance of an impact on survival or quality of life. More effective treatments will impact on quality of life and survival. Engagement activities throughout the award (Y1-7) will benefit patients and the public by empowering them to be part of the research effort.
B. NHS and clinicians (neuro-oncologists): A better understanding of disease progression will reduce staff time and cost implications to the NHS of administering ineffective treatments, and empower clinicians to better inform and advise patients. More effective treatments further equip clinicians to increase patient survival and quality of life, and additionally benefits the wider NHS through the provision of 'real world' evidence to support potentially expensive therapies. Diagnostic tests for GBM are not standardised across NHS Trusts, require multiple samples before they can be economically performed (leading to long wait times for results) and give results that can be subjectively interpreted. This causes frustration for neuro-oncologists, increased anxiety for patients and varying costs across the NHS, with 'poorer' Trusts using sub-standard techniques. The development of an advanced biomarker tests that address these issues will further benefit this group.
C. Cancer research charities: This project constitutes new avenues of brain cancer research, which will benefit charities (Y1+) because novel research routes instil confidence in the advancement of research and encourages donations. This will increase the funding available to apply these approaches to other brain cancer stages and types.
D. Medical technology innovators and companies: Experts in medical technology innovation will benefit from the identification of effective biomarkers, which require the development of accurate, rapid and economically viable tests or devices to enable their adoption within clinical practice.
E. Pharmaceutical companies: Increased understanding of mechanisms underpinning treatment resistance in GBM, and how they can be targeted, will benefit companies developing or repurposing drugs for this disease.
F. The government: This project will result in the training of highly skilled researchers in genomics and data analytics (including artificial intelligence), highlighted as areas of strength in which the government plans to further increase the UK's capacity over the next 20 years.
G. Research facilities: This project will maintain the health of genomics service provision in the UK by showing how the use of these services, and discussion with them to enable them to address current challenges, benefits scientific discovery.
1. A biomarker that stratifies primary GBM patients into two classes with different survival or response to specific treatments. This would be a candidate for inclusion in clinical practice as a diagnostic test used by clinicians to manage patient expectations of life-expectancy and help them to advise on treatment options in relation to likely increased survival vs risk to quality of life. TIMING: 5-10 years
2. Novel, more effective, therapeutic strategies for treating GBM. TIMING: 7-15 years
The following groups will be affected by these outputs, and other aspects of the funded research as a whole:
A. Patients and the public: More accurate prognosis of primary GBM tumours will better inform patients on the likely progression of their disease and help them and their families to cope and prepare. It may also avoid unnecessarily debilitating treatments in cases where there is a little chance of an impact on survival or quality of life. More effective treatments will impact on quality of life and survival. Engagement activities throughout the award (Y1-7) will benefit patients and the public by empowering them to be part of the research effort.
B. NHS and clinicians (neuro-oncologists): A better understanding of disease progression will reduce staff time and cost implications to the NHS of administering ineffective treatments, and empower clinicians to better inform and advise patients. More effective treatments further equip clinicians to increase patient survival and quality of life, and additionally benefits the wider NHS through the provision of 'real world' evidence to support potentially expensive therapies. Diagnostic tests for GBM are not standardised across NHS Trusts, require multiple samples before they can be economically performed (leading to long wait times for results) and give results that can be subjectively interpreted. This causes frustration for neuro-oncologists, increased anxiety for patients and varying costs across the NHS, with 'poorer' Trusts using sub-standard techniques. The development of an advanced biomarker tests that address these issues will further benefit this group.
C. Cancer research charities: This project constitutes new avenues of brain cancer research, which will benefit charities (Y1+) because novel research routes instil confidence in the advancement of research and encourages donations. This will increase the funding available to apply these approaches to other brain cancer stages and types.
D. Medical technology innovators and companies: Experts in medical technology innovation will benefit from the identification of effective biomarkers, which require the development of accurate, rapid and economically viable tests or devices to enable their adoption within clinical practice.
E. Pharmaceutical companies: Increased understanding of mechanisms underpinning treatment resistance in GBM, and how they can be targeted, will benefit companies developing or repurposing drugs for this disease.
F. The government: This project will result in the training of highly skilled researchers in genomics and data analytics (including artificial intelligence), highlighted as areas of strength in which the government plans to further increase the UK's capacity over the next 20 years.
G. Research facilities: This project will maintain the health of genomics service provision in the UK by showing how the use of these services, and discussion with them to enable them to address current challenges, benefits scientific discovery.
Organisations
- University of Leeds (Lead Research Organisation)
- University of Glasgow (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE (Collaboration)
- Newcastle University (Collaboration)
- University of Hull (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH (Collaboration)
- Vanderbilt University (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL (Collaboration)
- UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS (Collaboration)
- EARLHAM INSTITUTE (Collaboration)
- Brain Tumour Northwest (Project Partner)
- BRAIN MATRIX (Project Partner)
- GLASS Consortium (Project Partner)
- M D Anderson Cancer Center (Project Partner)
- THE BRAIN TUMOUR CHARITY (Project Partner)
Publications

Ajaib S
(2023)
GBMdeconvoluteR accurately infers proportions of neoplastic and immune cell populations from bulk glioblastoma transcriptomics data
in Neuro-Oncology



Malta TM
(2024)
The Epigenetic Evolution of Glioma Is Determined by the IDH1 Mutation Status and Treatment Regimen.
in Cancer research

Marcuccio F
(2024)
Single-cell nanobiopsy enables multigenerational longitudinal transcriptomics of cancer cells
in Science Advances

Stead LF
(2022)
Treating glioblastoma often makes a MES.
in Nature cancer

Tanner G
(2021)
Benchmarking pipelines for subclonal deconvolution of bulk tumour sequencing data.
in Nature communications

Tanner G
(2024)
IDHwt glioblastomas can be stratified by their transcriptional response to standard treatment, with implications for targeted therapy.
in Genome biology

Thomas M
(2023)
PREDICTING GLIOBLASTOMA GENE EXPRESSION THERAPY RESPONSE WITH MACHINE LEARNING
in Neuro-Oncology
Description | Glioblastoma (GBM) brain tumours lacking IDH1 mutations (IDHwt) have the worst prognosis of all brain neoplasms. Patients receive surgery and chemoradiotherapy but tumours almost always fatally recur. Using RNAseq data from 107 pairs of pre- and post-standard treatment locally recurrent IDHwt GBM tumours, we identified two responder subtypes based on therapy-driven changes in gene expression. In two thirds of patients a specific subset of genes is up-regulated from primary to recurrence (Up responders) and in one third the same genes are down-regulated (Down responders). Characterisation of the responder subtypes indicates subtype-specific adaptive treatment resistance mechanisms. In Up responders treatment enriches for quiescent proneural GBM stem cells and differentiated neoplastic cells with increased neurotransmitter signalling, whereas Down responders commonly undergo therapy-driven mesenchymal transition. Stratifying GBM tumours by response subtype may lead to more effective treatment. In support of this, modulators of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmitter signalling differentially sensitise Up and Down responder GBM models to standard treatment in vitro. |
Exploitation Route | Stratifying experimental models to better understand drug targets in GBM |
Sectors | Pharmaceuticals and Medical Biotechnology |
Description | National Cancer Research Institute Brain Strategy |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Participation in a guidance/advisory committee |
URL | https://www.ncri.org.uk/priorities-in-brain-tumour-research/ |
Description | Developing spatiotemporal analyses of imaging mass cytometry data to investigate therapy-driven changes in cell populations in glioblastoma brain tumours |
Amount | £24,900 (GBP) |
Funding ID | IBIN4LS |
Organisation | United Kingdom Research and Innovation |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 03/2021 |
End | 12/2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Amount | £25,000 (GBP) |
Organisation | Yorkshire's Brain Tumour Charity |
Sector | Charity/Non Profit |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2022 |
End | 04/2023 |
Title | GBM Up and Down Responder EZH2 ChIPseq |
Description | To ascertain the change in PRC2 occupancy at different promoter sets between primary and recurrent tumour, we performed EZH2 ChIPseq in longitudinal GBM samples from one Up and one Down responder from our cohort. |
Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
Year Produced | 2024 |
Provided To Others? | Yes |
Impact | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10848526/#CR82 |
URL | https://ega-archive.org/studies/EGAS50000000100 |
Title | GBMdeconvoluteR |
Description | We developed an IDH wild-type (IDHwt) GBM-specific single immune cell reference consisting of B cells, T cells, NK cells, microglia, tumour associated macrophages, monocytes, mast and DC cells. |
Type Of Material | Computer model/algorithm |
Year Produced | 2022 |
Provided To Others? | Yes |
Impact | We applied GBMdeconvoluteR to bulk GBM RNAseq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and recapitulated recent findings from multi-omics single cell studies with regards associations between mesenchymal GBM cancer cells and both lymphoid and myeloid cells. Furthermore, we expanded upon this to show that these associations are stronger in patients with worse prognosis. |
URL | https://gbmdeconvoluter.leeds.ac.uk |
Title | Paired GBM RNAseq |
Description | RNAseq data from pairs of pre- and post-standard treatment locally recurrent IDHwt GBM tumours |
Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
Year Produced | 2023 |
Provided To Others? | Yes |
Impact | We identified two responder subtypes based on therapy-driven changes in gene expression. In two thirds of patients a specific subset of genes is up-regulated from primary to recurrence (Up responders) and in one third the same genes are down-regulated (Down responders). Characterisation of the responder subtypes indicates subtype-specific adaptive treatment resistance mechanisms. In Up responders treatment enriches for quiescent proneural GBM stem cells and differentiated neoplastic cells with increased neurotransmitter signalling, whereas Down responders commonly undergo therapy-driven mesenchymal transition. Stratifying GBM tumours by response subtype may lead to more effective treatment. In support of this, modulators of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmitter signalling differentially sensitise Up and Down responder GBM models to standard treatment in vitro. |
URL | https://ega-archive.org/datasets/EGAD00001009806 |
Description | Andy Bulpitt |
Organisation | University of Leeds |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | We have now teamed up with Professor Andy Bulpitt (Position: Professor of Computer Science, Areas of expertise: computer vision; medical image analysis; machine learning) to continue this project via an EPSRC PhD studentship. We provide the data and biology expertise. |
Collaborator Contribution | We have now teamed up with Professor Andy Bulpitt (Position: Professor of Computer Science, Areas of expertise: computer vision; medical image analysis; machine learning) to continue this project via an EPSRC PhD studentship. He provides the machine learning expertise. |
Impact | Poster Presentation at Leeds Cancer Research Centre symposium for World Cancer Day |
Start Year | 2022 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Central Lancashire |
Department | Lancashire Law School |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Glasgow |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Hull |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Liverpool |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Nottingham |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Strathclyde |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | GlioModel |
Organisation | University of Wolverhampton |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | I am the lead of a new initiative called Gliomodel, which aims to establish a preclinical modelling resource for GBM; offering access to a range of models from in vitro through to ex vivo and in vivo for target validation and mechanistic work. This consortium currently includes 12 research groups across 7 institutes. My team have a spheroid model and lab-on-chip model |
Collaborator Contribution | University of Leeds - Glioma stem cell models, spheroid models, assembloids, surgical models, tissue-on-a-chip and orthotopic mouse xenografts University of Wolverhamptom - Short term cultures and Zebrafish (TBC) University of Central Lancashire - Orthotopic mouse xenografts, 3D scaffolds and BBB models University of Liverpool - Chick embryos, spheroid models, rat models University of Nottingham - Multi-region short term cultures, surgical models University of Hull - Robust microfluidic platform for maintaining clinical biopsies and spheroids University of Glasgow - 3D scaffolds (co-culture in development), spheroid models, orthotopic mouse xenografts, cranial window model, BBB models in development University of Strathclyde - 3D scaffolds, co-cultures and chick embryo models |
Impact | We have a collaboration consortium agreement in place. We have applied for join funding for proof of concept work and been successful. There is a PhD project planned across the consortium. We have two masters projects focused on standardising the models. |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | Glioma Cellular Resource |
Organisation | University of Edinburgh |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | We will apply the novel nanobiopsy to logitudinal characetrisation of the cell lines |
Collaborator Contribution | Provision of a patient derived cell lines with a matched GM counterpart (labelled so as to permanently fluoresce) |
Impact | MTA |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | Imaging Mass Cytometry |
Organisation | Vanderbilt University |
Department | Vanderbilt Medical Center |
Country | United States |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | We performed imaging mass cytometry on paired primary and recurrent GBM samples |
Collaborator Contribution | Rebecca Ihrie is an expert in the planning of imaging mass cytometry experiments and down stream data analysis, so she acted in an advisory capacity and became co-author of this work. We are now looking at ways to expand the analysis and sample cohort |
Impact | Multi-disciplinary: experimental biology, histopathology and computational biology Publication: Ajaib et al, 2023 |
Start Year | 2021 |
Description | Sequencing subcellular amounts of RNA |
Organisation | Earlham Institute |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | We are providing evidence that subcellular amounts of RNA can be extracted form GBM cells without killing them |
Collaborator Contribution | Dr Iain Macaulay at The Earlham Institute has provided training in single cell library production and worked with us to overcome the challenges inherent in sequencing subcellular amounts of RNA, helping us to optimise that protocol |
Impact | Successful optimisation of a protocol that enables us to create RNAseq libraries from ~10% of cytoplasmic RNA |
Start Year | 2019 |
Description | Spatial Transcriptomics |
Organisation | Newcastle University |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Single-cell spatial data from paired primary and current GBM |
Collaborator Contribution | Expertise, programmatic resource and joint supervision for single cell Transcriptomics |
Impact | We have been awarded funding for a PhD student together Multi-disciplinary: biomedical and computer sciences |
Start Year | 2024 |
Description | University of Hull - lab on a chip |
Organisation | University of Hull |
Country | United Kingdom |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | Investigating ways to expand the nanobiopsy platform, that we are developing through this grant, to an ex vivo preclinical model being developed at The University of Hull |
Collaborator Contribution | Provision and support for the use of an ex vivo preclinical model |
Impact | Submission of a CRUK Multidisciplinary award using preliminary data from this grant Multidisciplinary collaboration of engineers and biomedical scientists |
Start Year | 2019 |