📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

PHOSP-COVID Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study: a national consortium to understand and improve long-term health outcomes

Lead Research Organisation: University of Leicester
Department Name: Infection Immunity and Inflammation

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has tragically led to severe acute illness, hospitalisation and death. Beyond the health of those affected, it has had widespread economic, psychological and societal effects. The clinical spectrum is broad, ranging from those with no or minimal symptoms to severe pneumonia in 15-20% with evidence of widespread disease beyond the lung. As we emerge from the first wave of the pandemic we have new insights into the acute phase of this disease but very little information concerning longterm effects of COVID-19 and the ongoing medical, psychological and rehabilitation needs of these patients. We shall establish a national consortium and a research platform embedded within clinical care to understand and improve long-term outcomes for survivors following hospitalisation with COVID-19. We have built the consortium from existing expert groups across the UK and shall use standardised assessments of patients, including advanced imaging, recording of information and collection of samples. This study will provide us with a comprehensive understanding of the impact on the health of those that have been hospitalised with COVID-19. This will enable trials of new strategies of clinical care including personalised treatments to improve the long-term outcome of current and future COVID-19 survivors.

Technical Summary

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, has caused significant mortality and morbidity, alongside economic, psychological and societal effects. Over 100,000 people have been hospitalised in the UK with an in-hospital mortality of 26%. In addition to severe pneumonia, there is evidence of widespread pathology beyond the lung. To understand and improve long-term outcomes for survivors following hospitalisation with COVID-19, we shall establish a national platform embedding research into a standardised clinical pathway and biosampling integrated with ISARIC-4C and utilising the NIHR Bioresource. This will enable detailed clinical phenotyping of individuals. We propose to analyse routine
clinical data with linkage to retrospective and prospective health and social care records (Tier 1), enhanced clinical data and research-specific biosampling (Tier 2) and re-call of participants by genotype and phenotype for more detailed studies (Tier 3). We shall recruit 10000 individuals with a minimum of 5000 in Tier 2. We aim to i) determine the short to long-term chronic health (and health economic) sequelae of COVID-19 infection in post-hospitalisation survivors; to define demographic, clinical and molecular biomarkers of the susceptibility, development, progression and resolution of these health sequelae, ii) to understand the impact of interventions during the acute illness on these long-term sequelae and iii) to build the foundation for multiple indepth studies e.g. lung fibrosis, pulmonary and systemic vasculature, cardiometabolic, renal, sarcopaenia, rehabilitation, mental health and neurological disease. Our findings will
inform precision medicine in at risk groups by directing new clinical trials and care for current and future post-COVID-19 patients.

People

ORCID iD

Christopher Brightling (Principal Investigator)
Colin Berry (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-8636
Nicholas Hart (Co-Investigator)
David Lomas (Co-Investigator)
James Wild (Co-Investigator)
Dhruv Parekh (Co-Investigator)
Raminder Aul (Co-Investigator)
Iain McInnes (Co-Investigator)
Elizabeth Sapey (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-5482
Mark Toshner (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-6143
Mark Jones (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-6014
Ling-Pei Ho (Co-Investigator)
Louise Wain Taylor (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4951-1867
John Geddes (Co-Investigator)
Adrian Martineau (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-1721
Alfred Thompson (Co-Investigator)
Nick Maskell (Co-Investigator)
Michael Marks (Co-Investigator)
Dana Dawson (Co-Investigator)
Gisli Jenkins (Co-Investigator)
Paul Pfeffer (Co-Investigator)
John Kenneth Baillie (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-793X
Dan Wootton (Co-Investigator)
Keir Lewis (Co-Investigator)
Matt Brown (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-8211
Liam Heaney (Co-Investigator)
Alexander Robert Horsley (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-0058
Aziz Sheikh (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056
Stefan Neubauer (Co-Investigator)
Neil Hanley (Co-Investigator)
Rachael Evans (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-868X
Malcolm Semple (Co-Investigator) orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9700-0418
James Chalmers (Co-Investigator)
PAUL BEIRNE (Co-Investigator)
Sarah Rowland-Jones (Co-Investigator)
Anthony De Soyza (Co-Investigator)
Edwin Chilvers (Co-Investigator)

Publications

10 25 50

publication icon
Brightling C (2023) Long COVID research: an update from the PHOSP-COVID Scientific Summit in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

 
Description The severity of illness following infection with COVID-19 has decreased because of public health policies, vaccination and other treatments. However, in the wake of the pandemic post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 known as 'Long-COVID' has emerged. Long-COVID is a chronic illness in people that continue to experience ongoing symptoms and disability. The PHOSP-COVID consortium was established in August 2020 and includes 83 hospitals, 25 universities, 10+ patient groups and charities and 500+ researchers. We have recruited ~8000 participants of whom ~3000 have undergone detailed tests and sampling at ~6 and 12 months. In our consortium patients, clinicians and researchers have co-created priority questions and our aims include: i) to describe the impact of long-COVID on people that were hospitalised with COVID-19 infection, ii) what features are associated either with good or poor recovery, iii) what is the underlying cause of long-COVID, iv) is long-COVID altered by treatments given for the acute infection and v) can we develop treatments for people with long-COVID to improve recovery.
We found that at 5 months only about 30% of people that were hospitalised due to COVID-19 infection had fully recovered. This proportion was similar after 1 year with only marginal improvement from 5 months to 1 year. You were more likely not to have recovered if you were a woman, were between the ages of 35-65 years old, were obese, had multiple long-term conditions prior to COVID-19 infection or required mechanical ventilation whilst hospitalised. We found that the treatments given for the acute infection such as corticosteroids did not affect the likelihood of recovery. We found that the severity of symptoms largely grouped together except for 'brain-fog', which could occur on its own. Those with the most severe symptoms had evidence of persistent inflammation measured with a simple blood test called CRP. This measure is associated with a specific inflammatory pathway and we have started a trial of a drug targeting this pathway. We have identified other groups of proteins measured in the blood that are linked to symptoms associated with particular organs in the body. We have found that two proteins, fibrinogen and D-Dimer were raised at the time of Covid-19 suggesting that blood clots during COVID-19 may be a cause of ongoing cognitive problems in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. Magnetic resonance imaging in our participants showed changes in the brain, heart, lungs and liver. In the lungs, about 5% have evidence of early lung scarring on CT scans. We are looking at how these changes link to severity of disease and impairments in the immune response. In older people with long-COVID the immune response is decreased, there is increased auto-immunity with activation of specific types of immune cells. We have found that exercise capacity is reduced and in a trial showed that rehabilitation improved exercise capacity. We have also found that sleep disturbance after COVID-19 hospitalisation is associated with breathlessness, reduced lung function, anxiety and muscle weakness.
More work is ongoing to help to develop new tests, new treatments and impact on healthcare.
Exploitation Route in discussion with international health organisations e.g. WHO, NIH, ERS on policy, future collaborations and policy. In discussion with major pharma on partnerships and intervention studies including possible major EU bids.
Sectors Healthcare

URL https://www.phosp.org/
 
Description Description of: New disease entity - Long-COVID. New health care systems and clinics understanding of risk factors understanding of underlying mechanisms Development of biomarkers and new interventions. influence on national and international healthcare policy e.g. guidelines, government advisory panels.
First Year Of Impact 2000
Sector Healthcare
 
Guideline Title NICE guideline for Long-COVID
Description National COVID policy
Geographic Reach Multiple continents/international 
Policy Influence Type Citation in clinical guidelines
Impact PHOSP-COVID has greatly influenced the set-up on the national network of long-COVID clinics.
 
Description National COVID policy
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Citation in other policy documents
Impact Underpinned the research strategy for long-COVID nationally and influenced discussions at SAGE and DHSC long-COVID task force.
 
Description national Covid Inquiry
Geographic Reach National 
Policy Influence Type Contribution to a national consultation/review
URL https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/
 
Title Supplementary information files for The effect of COVID rehabilitation for ongoing symptoms post hospitalisation with COVID-19 (PHOSP-R): protocol for a randomised parallel group controlled trial on behalf of the PHOSP consortium 
Description Supplementary files for article The effect of COVID rehabilitation for ongoing symptoms post hospitalisation with COVID-19 (PHOSP-R): protocol for a randomised parallel group controlled trial on behalf of the PHOSP consortium   Introduction: Many adults hospitalised with COVID-19 have persistent symptoms such as fatigue, breathlessness and brain fog that limit day-to-day activities. These symptoms can last over 2 years. Whilst there is limited controlled studies on interventions that can support those with ongoing symptoms, there has been some promise in rehabilitation interventions in improving function and symptoms either using face-to-face or digital methods, but evidence remains limited and these studies often lack a control group. Methods and analysis: This is a nested single-blind, parallel group, randomised control trial with embedded qualitative evaluation comparing rehabilitation (face-to-face or digital) to usual care and conducted within the PHOSP-COVID study. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on exercise capacity, quality of life and symptoms such as breathlessness and fatigue. The primary outcome is the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test following the eight week intervention phase. Secondary outcomes include measures of function, strength and subjective assessment of symptoms. Blood inflammatory markers and muscle biopsies are an exploratory outcome. The interventions last eight weeks and combine symptom-titrated exercise therapy, symptom management and education delivered either in a face-to-face setting or through a digital platform (www.yourcovidrecovery.nhs.uk). The proposed sample size is 159 participants, and data will be intention-to-treat analyses comparing rehabilitation (face-to-face or digital) to usual care. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was gained as part of the PHOSP-COVID study by Yorkshire and the Humber Leeds West Research NHS Ethics Committee, and the study was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN trial registry (ISRCTN13293865). Results will be disseminated to stakeholders, including patients and members of the public, and published in appropriate journals.   Article summary Strengths and limitations of this study • This protocol utilises two interventions to support those with ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 • This is a two-centre parallel-group randomised controlled trial • The protocol has been supported by patient and public involvement groups who identified treatments of symptoms and activity limitation as a top priority 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/dataset/Supplementary_information_files_for_The_effect_of_CO...
 
Title Supplementary information files for The effect of COVID rehabilitation for ongoing symptoms post hospitalisation with COVID-19 (PHOSP-R): protocol for a randomised parallel group controlled trial on behalf of the PHOSP consortium 
Description Supplementary files for article The effect of COVID rehabilitation for ongoing symptoms post hospitalisation with COVID-19 (PHOSP-R): protocol for a randomised parallel group controlled trial on behalf of the PHOSP consortium Introduction: Many adults hospitalised with COVID-19 have persistent symptoms such as fatigue, breathlessness and brain fog that limit day-to-day activities. These symptoms can last over 2 years. Whilst there is limited controlled studies on interventions that can support those with ongoing symptoms, there has been some promise in rehabilitation interventions in improving function and symptoms either using face-to-face or digital methods, but evidence remains limited and these studies often lack a control group. Methods and analysis: This is a nested single-blind, parallel group, randomised control trial with embedded qualitative evaluation comparing rehabilitation (face-to-face or digital) to usual care and conducted within the PHOSP-COVID study. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on exercise capacity, quality of life and symptoms such as breathlessness and fatigue. The primary outcome is the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test following the eight week intervention phase. Secondary outcomes include measures of function, strength and subjective assessment of symptoms. Blood inflammatory markers and muscle biopsies are an exploratory outcome. The interventions last eight weeks and combine symptom-titrated exercise therapy, symptom management and education delivered either in a face-to-face setting or through a digital platform (www.yourcovidrecovery.nhs.uk). The proposed sample size is 159 participants, and data will be intention-to-treat analyses comparing rehabilitation (face-to-face or digital) to usual care. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was gained as part of the PHOSP-COVID study by Yorkshire and the Humber Leeds West Research NHS Ethics Committee, and the study was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN trial registry (ISRCTN13293865). Results will be disseminated to stakeholders, including patients and members of the public, and published in appropriate journals. Article summary Strengths and limitations of this study • This protocol utilises two interventions to support those with ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 • This is a two-centre parallel-group randomised controlled trial • The protocol has been supported by patient and public involvement groups who identified treatments of symptoms and activity limitation as a top priority 
Type Of Material Database/Collection of data 
Year Produced 2023 
Provided To Others? Yes  
URL https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/dataset/Supplementary_information_files_for_The_effect_of_CO...