Rapid recovery of high resolution topographic and kinematic data from the Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand
Lead Research Organisation:
University of Sheffield
Department Name: Geography
Abstract
Early in the morning of 14th November 2017, a Magnitude 7.8 earthquake occurred in the South Island of New Zealand. The earthquake started around 9 km north of Culverden, and rupture on the fault plane propagated rapidly northwards in a complex pattern along a series of nine separate faults, with dramatic surface ruptures (with up to ~10m of horizontal slip) and large-scale landsliding between Kaikoura and Blenheim. Only two fatalities were recorded, one as a result of a heart attack, and one in Kaikoura when a historic homestead collapsed.
The earthquake is remarkable for several reasons - it is probably the largest earthquake event dominated by horizontal movement to occur at a time and location where there were many scientific instruments already operating to record the seismic waves and determine the ground motion. The earthquake occurred mostly on land, meaning that we are may be able to reconstruct what the sense of movement was from features such as roads and fences that were broken and moved during the event. Furthermore, the event was complex, with slip on multiple faults of different type, and with large variations in slip over short distances.
However, many aspects of the surface record which may be used to determine the sense of movement are relatively short-lived. They are gradually reduced in size and sharpness, and eventually destroyed or distorted by surface processes such as slope wash during heavy rain and by anthropogenic remediation such as repairing highways and repositioning broken fences. Following the movement that occurs during the earthquake, a slower motion known as post-seismic slip can occur on timescales of weeks and months. The next winter season will obliterate many of the finer surface features. These are very important for the detailed interpretation of how and when the earthquake rupture developed, and include soft features on fault scarps and landscape surfaces, for example where these are composed of gravel.
We plan to undertake two main tasks: i) to record key selected examples of these temporary landscape features before they are destroyed by surface processes, as soon after the event as is possible, to help tell the difference between initial fault slip during the earthquake from post-seismic movement, and ii) to emplace a number of semi-permanent GPS recorders which record their ground position to within a few cm, to capture the rate and timing of post-seismic movement over a period of around 3 months. Both of these tasks are critically time-dependent for reasons of preservation (weathering and erosion) and contamination (e.g. new deposition of sediment above the surface features).
Undertaking this research soon will allow us to record the maximum amount of data useful for understanding the detail of the earthquake event. This can help in interpreting other earthquakes, and in gaining an improved understanding of what happened during ancient seismic events, so that we are able to improve seismic hazard assessment. This assists local and central governments, along with authorities and suppliers of services such as roads, railways, power, water etc. to plan more accurately for future earthquake events, and consequently improve the likely outcomes for members of the public in those regions.
The earthquake is remarkable for several reasons - it is probably the largest earthquake event dominated by horizontal movement to occur at a time and location where there were many scientific instruments already operating to record the seismic waves and determine the ground motion. The earthquake occurred mostly on land, meaning that we are may be able to reconstruct what the sense of movement was from features such as roads and fences that were broken and moved during the event. Furthermore, the event was complex, with slip on multiple faults of different type, and with large variations in slip over short distances.
However, many aspects of the surface record which may be used to determine the sense of movement are relatively short-lived. They are gradually reduced in size and sharpness, and eventually destroyed or distorted by surface processes such as slope wash during heavy rain and by anthropogenic remediation such as repairing highways and repositioning broken fences. Following the movement that occurs during the earthquake, a slower motion known as post-seismic slip can occur on timescales of weeks and months. The next winter season will obliterate many of the finer surface features. These are very important for the detailed interpretation of how and when the earthquake rupture developed, and include soft features on fault scarps and landscape surfaces, for example where these are composed of gravel.
We plan to undertake two main tasks: i) to record key selected examples of these temporary landscape features before they are destroyed by surface processes, as soon after the event as is possible, to help tell the difference between initial fault slip during the earthquake from post-seismic movement, and ii) to emplace a number of semi-permanent GPS recorders which record their ground position to within a few cm, to capture the rate and timing of post-seismic movement over a period of around 3 months. Both of these tasks are critically time-dependent for reasons of preservation (weathering and erosion) and contamination (e.g. new deposition of sediment above the surface features).
Undertaking this research soon will allow us to record the maximum amount of data useful for understanding the detail of the earthquake event. This can help in interpreting other earthquakes, and in gaining an improved understanding of what happened during ancient seismic events, so that we are able to improve seismic hazard assessment. This assists local and central governments, along with authorities and suppliers of services such as roads, railways, power, water etc. to plan more accurately for future earthquake events, and consequently improve the likely outcomes for members of the public in those regions.
Planned Impact
In the short term, during the time-period of the urgency grant, the direct beneficiaries will be our project partners GNS Science (New Zealand), our industry partner Geospatial Research Ltd (GRL, UK), as well as the local rural landowners around the rupture on the northern extend of the South Island of New Zealand.
GNS Science will benefit from an increased number of fault observations, increasing their capacity to respond to this major event, and enabling more of the massive long fault rupture to be covered in a timely fashion before erosional processes start to diminish it and the offsets are contaminated by further fault slip processes. Also, the proposal provides the opportunity to test the accurate measurement of fault offsets using topography models acquired at a range of very high resolutions (sub meter to centimetre scale) - techniques that may be of use in future earthquake and fault studies, as well as for validating the effectiveness of the airborne LiDAR datasets being acquired at the metre scale to detect smaller deformation signals.
Our collaboration with our industrial project partner provides the opportunity to test and validate newly developed instrumentation for measuring positions accurately (from Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GNSS) measuring ground displacements after a major onshore earthquake. This will benefit the company by both opening up new technologies for commercial applications and also potential new customers in New Zealand (such as our other project partner, GNS Science). This will be timely in preparation for the recently "gone live" EU Galileo satellite system, which offers the prospect of much increased accuracy of positioning for commercial users over the coming two years.
The local rural landowners would be beneficiaries of the work through the mapping of the extent of distributed fault damage to rural residential land, which is included in the Earthquake Commissions (EQC) insurance coverage.
For the post project, medium term, timescale of a few years, the beneficiaries would expand to encompass the populations of both the South and North islands of New Zealand as the short-term benefits are propagated through the advice provided by GNS to local and national governments. This will be of particular importance to the capital city (Wellington, population 400,000), where the stress from this recent earthquake has increased on those in and around the city of Wellington.
Longer Term and indirect impacts and benefits:
Over the much longer term, far beyond the timescale of the urgency project, into the next decade, the beneficiaries could potential expand more globally to encompass those organisations charged with updating earthquake rupture forecasts and the populations that these forecasts are designed to help protect. Updates to national scenarios would benefit with improved forecasts that are more likely to include the potential for these large complex earthquake rupture events. This will benefit populations by improving the preparedness for large earthquakes, resulting in reductions in fatalities, injuries and property losses. The outputs of this proposal will be a part of a much greater whole of research where we build upon recent work the investigators have done on understanding the biggest jump that is possible between faults in earthquake ruptures.
GNS Science will benefit from an increased number of fault observations, increasing their capacity to respond to this major event, and enabling more of the massive long fault rupture to be covered in a timely fashion before erosional processes start to diminish it and the offsets are contaminated by further fault slip processes. Also, the proposal provides the opportunity to test the accurate measurement of fault offsets using topography models acquired at a range of very high resolutions (sub meter to centimetre scale) - techniques that may be of use in future earthquake and fault studies, as well as for validating the effectiveness of the airborne LiDAR datasets being acquired at the metre scale to detect smaller deformation signals.
Our collaboration with our industrial project partner provides the opportunity to test and validate newly developed instrumentation for measuring positions accurately (from Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GNSS) measuring ground displacements after a major onshore earthquake. This will benefit the company by both opening up new technologies for commercial applications and also potential new customers in New Zealand (such as our other project partner, GNS Science). This will be timely in preparation for the recently "gone live" EU Galileo satellite system, which offers the prospect of much increased accuracy of positioning for commercial users over the coming two years.
The local rural landowners would be beneficiaries of the work through the mapping of the extent of distributed fault damage to rural residential land, which is included in the Earthquake Commissions (EQC) insurance coverage.
For the post project, medium term, timescale of a few years, the beneficiaries would expand to encompass the populations of both the South and North islands of New Zealand as the short-term benefits are propagated through the advice provided by GNS to local and national governments. This will be of particular importance to the capital city (Wellington, population 400,000), where the stress from this recent earthquake has increased on those in and around the city of Wellington.
Longer Term and indirect impacts and benefits:
Over the much longer term, far beyond the timescale of the urgency project, into the next decade, the beneficiaries could potential expand more globally to encompass those organisations charged with updating earthquake rupture forecasts and the populations that these forecasts are designed to help protect. Updates to national scenarios would benefit with improved forecasts that are more likely to include the potential for these large complex earthquake rupture events. This will benefit populations by improving the preparedness for large earthquakes, resulting in reductions in fatalities, injuries and property losses. The outputs of this proposal will be a part of a much greater whole of research where we build upon recent work the investigators have done on understanding the biggest jump that is possible between faults in earthquake ruptures.
Description | The key findings relate to two main features of this earthquake. These are 1) an incredible amount of complexity and diversity in the surface slip expressed by offset features such as fence lines, and 2) slip directions in some locations that appear to be in the opposite sense from those expected from the longer term history of fault movement. Furthermore, we now know that at one key location within the complex system of faults involved in the event, these faults had effectively "locked up" by three months after the earthquake, contrary to our initial expectations. This result is significant, and at a different spatial scale, being more localised, from results acquired by other researchers; interesting results from other researchers do not show quite the same pattern of "locking", providing insights as to where and how this post-seismic movement is occurring. Our high resolution laser scanning, where combined with a previous survey of the ground surface made from a drone, provide a substantially enhanced assessment of fault slip in one mountainous area where we worked, in comparison to results based solely on post-earthquake high resolution investigations performed by other researchers. |
Exploitation Route | We are taking this research forward in several different ways. A subset of the original team has developed a collaboration with colleagues at the Earth Observatory, Singapore, as part of a NERC-funded International Opportunities Fund project. A second project jointly funded by the US National Science Foundation involving the present PI will explore the recent geological history of the Kekerengu Fault, one of the principle faults that moved during the Kaikoura Earthquake. This new project, like the original NERC Urgency award, includes as partners New Zealand's GNS Science, responsible for seismic hazard analysis. This research will help evaluate seismic and tsunami hazard for the region, and better understand these hazards elsewhere in the world. Opportunities to make use of the landscape changes caused by the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake to improve our understanding of the relationship between earthquake magnitude and the details of seismic shaking to the record of ground disturbance such as offset stream channels and the effects of landslides triggered by ground shaking during the earthquake will be explored. |
Sectors | Construction,Education,Environment,Transport |
Description | Our findings are being assimilated into those from different projects where New Zealand's GNS Science was a research partner. GNS Science is responsible for delivering seismic hazard analysis for the government and population of New Zealand. Updated understanding of the style of earthquakes and the relationships between seismic shaking, fault slip, earthquake magnitude and damage to both natural landscape features and engineered infrastructure provide opportunities to further refine both broad forecasts and specific expectations for future earthquakes. This allows the improvement of infrastructure and increased preparedness, helping to ensure better outcomes and reduced economic impacts in future earthquake and tsunami events. |
First Year Of Impact | 2018 |
Sector | Education,Environment |
Impact Types | Policy & public services |
Description | NERC (UK) International Opportunities Fund |
Amount | £34,958 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NE/R00515X/1 |
Organisation | Natural Environment Research Council |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 01/2018 |
End | 06/2019 |
Description | NSFGEO-NERC: Latest Pleistocene-Holocene incremental slip record of the Kekerengu-Jordan fault system, northern South Island, New Zealand |
Amount | £223,114 (GBP) |
Funding ID | NE/S007091/1 |
Organisation | Natural Environment Research Council |
Sector | Public |
Country | United Kingdom |
Start | 09/2018 |
End | 08/2022 |
Title | GNSS developments |
Description | Significant developments to GNSS data collection made and assessed during the project. |
Type Of Material | Improvements to research infrastructure |
Year Produced | 2017 |
Provided To Others? | No |
Impact | Wide interest in applying similar approach to different applications. Publication is expected soon, and following this, we expect even more widespread uptake of this methodology. |
Title | Data generated |
Description | High resolution topographic data. |
Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
Year Produced | 2018 |
Provided To Others? | No |
Impact | Development of further research proposals and projects. Data will be included in future seismic hazard assessment within New Zealand. |
Description | EOS collaboration |
Organisation | Nanyang Technological University |
Department | Earth Observatory Singapore |
Country | Singapore |
Sector | Academic/University |
PI Contribution | We have contributed data, observations and ideas during our research. |
Collaborator Contribution | They have contributed expertise in numerical modelling and simulation. |
Impact | The outcome so far is the award of an additional NERC International Opportunities Fund grant which commenced in 2018. |
Start Year | 2017 |
Description | ATD-2021 invited talk |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Invited talk to French meeting "Active Tectonics and Dating" held in Praz-sur_Arly, Haut Savoire, France, 14-16th September 2021. The talk was titled "Luminescence Dating Techniques applied to Active Tectonic Contexts" and was made to an audience both in person at the meeting venue, but also on-line. The focus of the meeting was improved understanding of seismic hazard and fault movement in France, with a particular emphasis on nuclear safety. There was significant debate, discussion and engagement with me following my presentation, including invitation for involvement in a forthcoming workshop in France. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
URL | https://www.sigma-2.net/agenda/international-workshop-on-active-tectonics-and-dating.html |
Description | CEREGE 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Presentation and practical exercises focussed at developing an improved understanding of how chronological methods, in particular OSL and IRSL dating, can be used to determine the timing of past seismic events and to evaluate fault slip rates. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
Description | COMET 2019 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | A short presentation about active tectonics and the relationship between spatial and temporal complexity based on both the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake and previous Marlborough region earthquakes, at the NERC COMET annual meeting, June 2019. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | Durham visit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Presentation at Durham University attended by wide range of audience members, followed by a workshop with a group of masters students. Subsequent discussion with colleagues about future research possibilities and applic ation of technical developments made during the project. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | EGU 2019 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Talk at EGU 2019 relating spatial & temporal fault complexity to landscape development: comparing the Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, 2016, to past behaviour of the Marlborough Fault System, New Zealand. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | EGU talk 2022 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Talk at the European Geosciences Union congress in Vienna 23-27th May 2023, titled "New luminescence chronological tools for dating and tracing sediment movement", based on findings from research in New Zealand as part of several projects. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
URL | https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-12285 |
Description | EGU2018 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Oral presentation at the European Geosciences Union conference in Vienna, 2018, within a session focussed at seismic hazard analysis including a significant number of non-academic professionals from different government agencies charged with seismic hazard analysis. The talk was entitled "Understanding fault complexity in New Zealand: Relationship of the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura earthquake to previous deformation within the Marlborough Fault Zone". The audience also included postgraduate students from across Europe and the world. The presentation resulted in multiple conversations with participants, and discussion of the implications of the projexct findings and ideas for other hazard contexts. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | EOS visit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Presentation at the Earth Observatory Singapore (EOS), Nanyang Technological University attended by wide range of audience members, followed by a workshop with EOS colleagues. Subsequent discussion about additional future research possibilities and application of technical developments made during the project, as well as outreach activitiues making use of existing EOS networks in SE Asia. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | Fieldwork outreach 2019 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | During several visits, the team engaged members of the public in some of the areas of New Zealand most significantly affected by the Kaikoura earthquake, and talked to them about likely outcomes such as increased flood risk following river channel migration and elevation changes. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | GNSS talk Durham |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Presentation about technical developments made and tested during the course of the project. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | GNSS talk, Computer Sciences, Durham |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Local |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Presentation about GNSS data collection and processing to audience from cross-disciplinary department (Computer Science) at Durham University |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | GNSS visit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Visit to New Zealand's government body responsible for seismic hazard analysis (GNS Science), Wellington, New Zealand. Discussion of research findings, methods and approaches. Exchange of information. Plans made for future collaborative research. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Group Meeting |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Workshop for full project team plus international visitors and interested academics from several departments. Interaction included short presentations, lunch, social event in evening. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | LED2021 talk |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Presentation at the LED2021 International conference held on-line in September 2021. There were 464 participants from around the world who took part, including 101 students and 75 ECRs. There were ~2800 logins during the 5 day meeting, and >5400 since presentations were uploaded |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
URL | https://led2021.wordpress.com/thank-you-for-being-part-of-led2021/ |
Description | Leicester visit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Presentation made at Leicester University, with attendance by members from two departments. Debate and discussion following presentation. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | MMU visit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Other audiences |
Results and Impact | Presentation followed by discussion at Manchester Metropolitan University, including visitors from the University of Manchester. Lively debate about key issues following talk. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | NTU visit |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Discussions and presentations during project meeting at NTU Singapore, May 2019 |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2019 |
Description | Presentation to University of Southern California |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Postgraduate students |
Results and Impact | Talk about methods used in luminescence dating of geomorphic features relating to fault slip and earthquake events, focussing on results from New Zealand and California. This talk was situated within a university course at USC (University of Southern California) on tectonic geomorphology. It included an opportunity for questions by students, and led to several on-going conversations in the days and weeks following. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
Description | Resident/stakeholder engament |
Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | During several visits, the team engaged members of the public in some of the most significantly affected areas of New Zealand, and talked to them about likely outcomes such as increased flood risk following river channel migration and elevation changes. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2017 |
Description | Rhodes AGU 2021 talk 2 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Talk at AGU 2021 in New Orleans, USA, titled "T43B-02 - Improving and assessing luminescence chronological approaches for the determination of slip rate and in paleoseismology". Several audience members approached me to discuss issues further following the presentation. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
URL | https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm21/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/955157 |
Description | TSG 2018 |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Presentation at the 2018 Tectonics Study Group meeting in Plymouth, UK, entitled "Sub-parallel normal and thrust faulting in the same earthquake?" presenting results from the Urgency Award and establishing the intellectual framework for the associated IOF award. This was a large audience including participants from outside academia. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2018 |
Description | Talk to Malvern U3A geology group |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Talk about relationships between geomorphology, earthquakes, landscape evolution and geochronology, focussing in particular on New Zealand, using data from this suite of projects. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2021 |
Description | Talk to Shropshire Geological Society |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | Regional |
Primary Audience | Public/other audiences |
Results and Impact | Talk about relationships between geomorphology, earthquakes, landscape evolution and geochronology, focussing in particular on New Zealand, using data from this suite of projects. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020 |
Description | UoC Santiago |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | International |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | Departmental seminar in the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, with discussion and further interaction with department members after the close of the formal session, on 24 August 2022. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |