NEC06550 Does the discharge of chemicals to the environment harm wildlife populations?

Lead Research Organisation: NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Department Name: Pollution (Wallingford)

Abstract

Traditional chemical risk assessment relies on undertaking laboratory ecotoxicity studies, but can only assume what the population or ecosystem functioning consequences might be. We aim to move beyond these current limitations by interrogating wildlife population data (terrestrial, freshwater and marine) in the context of chemical exposure in a way that will progress the field.

Our high-level aim is to identify which populations and environments are doing well under the current chemical regime and which are not. This will allow the UK to focus its research where the greatest wildlife declines are occurring and bring clarity to the issue of chemical risk in the environment that continues to cause great uncertainty.

Only a few studies have exploited Britain's long-term wildlife population data with regards to the influence of chemical exposure. Chemical exposures we will examine will include pesticides in the terrestrial and freshwater environments, the chemical mixture in sewage effluent, metals and persistent organic pollutants. We will be looking at macroinvertebrates and fishes in our rivers, invertebrates and sparrowhawks on land and cetaceans (dolphins and killer whales) off our coasts. These environments and species represent current concerns across the natural environment for both diffuse and point source pollution. We will focus on species and taxa that are either core providers of ES or represent aspects of native biodiversity identified by the public as important to societal wellbeing. There are many stressors and compensating factors other than chemicals that can influence wildlife populations. We will incorporate such factors into our analyses to assess their role and significance and thus also address the research question: How important are chemical stressors in relation to other pressures in the environment? By comparing long-term and spatially explicit trends in natural populations, with the response predicted by classical ecotoxicity as reported in the literature, we will evaluate whether such tests are indicative of impacts in the wild. This is essential to assess to what extent traditional risk assessments, typical of those used in the Water Framework and similar Directives, are predictive of outcomes for wildlife populations in terrestrial, freshwater or marine environments.

Planned Impact

Through the examination of population monitoring data, we will inform the regulatory approach to chemicals by evaluating whether the current approach protects wildlife populations and their ecosystem services (ES). Our aim is to identify which populations and environments are doing well under the current chemical regime and which are not. This is tied closely with our regulatory and operational stakeholders' aims. Thus, evaluating the population response to chemical exposure will provide vital information for a wide range of stakeholders and they will be able to focus on chemicals and environments where the greatest declines in native wildlife are occurring. The pathways for engaging and promoting these impacts are detailed in the Pathways to Impact section.

Regulators and Government such as the EA and Defra welcome this proposal. Our research will complement laboratory studies on the impact of a chemical on an organism and provide knowledge on the true impact on wildlife populations over time in the real environment, something that cannot be replicated in the laboratory. The EA are keen to know if there are population impacts occurring despite regulation and we are responding to the Defra Group ARI. We will meet their needs to 'a more effective use of observations to better understand risk' and 'to provide a better understanding of how chemical pollution may be changing the environment'.

The Chemicals Industry including pharmaceuticals, personal care and agrochemicals, are aware that a proportion of their products enter the environment following sewage treatment or agricultural application. Our industry partners (Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, Pfizer, Roche) are all giving strong support to this proposal. They believe this project will greatly help their industry by opening a new line of evidence on the true impact of their chemicals on wildlife. It will give greater confidence and allow decisions to be based on evidence rather than assumptions. This research will improve regulator-industry relationships by giving regulators greater certainty regarding where to show caution and put further controls on products and where the burden of an overly cautious approach may be reduced.

The Water Industry have argued that the risks from chemicals, particularly pharmaceuticals, which escape in wastewater are not well understood We will determine the impact of chemicals released in wastewater both on macroinvertebrates and fish populations over recent decades. If no population consequences are occurring in waters receiving wastewater then we can argue that such costly expenditure and additional energy requirement is unnecessary; the current UK bill for stringent tertiary treatment is an estimated £30 billion. We have close support from Thames Water for our freshwater work.

The Recreation Industry such as Angling, are important stakeholders. They can place considerable pressure on politicians and industry when ill-informed speculation on chemical impacts takes off. Our NGO contacts have expressed great interest in the outcome of our proposal. We will help this sector to better understand chemical pressure and where to focus conservation efforts to mitigate it. Environmental NGOs will recognise the value of our work on assessing population-level impacts of chemicals to address their concerns.

Wider Dissemination and Building Capacity
Incorporating population studies routinely in the way we examine the impact of chemicals, or indeed other human activities, will be a paradigm shift. As well as through publications, we will influence other stakeholders by hosting a web-based training resource to reveal our sources and approach. Showing how publically available monitoring data can be used will democratise the access to science and the power it can provide. It will help grow a new generation of scientists using this approach.

Publications

10 25 50
publication icon
Johnson A (2019) Is freshwater macroinvertebrate biodiversity being harmed by synthetic chemicals in municipal wastewater? in Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health

publication icon
Johnson A (2019) The necessity for wildlife population studies to assess real chemical impacts in Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health

publication icon
Mancini F (2019) Agrochemicals in the wild: Identifying links between pesticide use and declines of nontarget organisms in Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health

publication icon
Shore R (2019) Population-level impacts of chemical contaminants on apex avian species in Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health

Related Projects

Project Reference Relationship Related To Start End Award Value
NE/S000100/1 07/09/2018 30/11/2019 £1,417,765
NE/S000100/2 Transfer NE/S000100/1 01/12/2019 30/09/2022 £987,246
 
Description NFU arrival on our external advisory board 
Organisation National Farmers Union
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Public 
PI Contribution NFU came onboard as they were keen to assess and advise on the way we are identifying risks from pesticides
Collaborator Contribution Attendance at all our PMG meetings
Impact none
Start Year 2019
 
Description Syngenta and our PMG 
Organisation Syngenta International AG
Department Syngenta Ltd (Bracknell)
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Request to be involved in our external advisory board
Collaborator Contribution They have provided useful information on current and future pesticide use and trends
Impact Helpful information provided for our Science paper
Start Year 2019
 
Description Unilever arrival on our external advisory board 
Organisation Unilever
Country United Kingdom 
Sector Private 
PI Contribution Discussions are ongoing into how our new knowledge could inform Unilever product risk assessment
Collaborator Contribution Involvement at all our project management group meetings
Impact Helpful information provided that was used in our Science paper
Start Year 2019
 
Description Cafe Scientifique Oxford 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Cafe Scientifique is an opportunity for the general public to hear about science at an evening event. In my talk about fish, oestrogens and water quality I explained our new approaches to assess chemical impacts on wildlife
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Cornwall's Beekeeping Convention, Turo 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact Beekeeping convention talk covering a range of wild bee related topics, sustainable intensification and impacts of pesticides. Opportunity to explain the approach used in our project
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Defra organised meeting to discuss UK chemical strategy 
Form Of Engagement Activity A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Policymakers/politicians
Results and Impact Opportunity to explain the latest approaches as used by our project in assessing the impacts of chemicals on the environment, particularly valuable in underlining the need for the UK to maintain its monitoring network!
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2020
 
Description Meeting organised by Sainsburys on water quality 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact I was one of 3 academics who discussed different aspects of water quality to Sainsburys senior staff and their suppliers. It allowed me to explain the approach used in my current project to assess chemical impacts
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Meeting with Japanese scientists in the UK/J Defra organised working group 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Opportunity to explain the latest approaches as used by our project in assessing the impacts of chemicals on the environment
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Meeting with senior staff of Thames Water 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an open day or visit at my research institution
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Regional
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact Opportunity to explain the latest approaches as used by our project in assessing the impacts of chemicals on the environment. Thames Water managers endorsed our approach.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Poster on project presented at SETAC Helsinki meeting 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Opportunity to show our research approaches as used by our project in assessing the impacts of chemicals on the environment to a very wide audiance
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Presentation given to the Campaign for Responsible Rodenticide Use 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Industry/Business
Results and Impact A presentation given to the Campaign for Responsible Rodenticide Use,. This was a description of the CHEMPOP project aims and progress, and specifically the work package on rodenticides. This information was disseminated through a presentation to a key stakeholder group, the Campaign for Responsible Rodenticide Use. This is an industry led- consortium of rodenticide manufacturers, distributors and users (pest control companies, representatives of other professional user groups such as farmers) who have a keen interest in understanding the environmental impact of their products
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Talk to CSIC in Spain, which is an institute concerned with water quality 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Opportunity to discuss the latest approaches to study chemicals in the environment in the UK, so could explain the methods in this project
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Talk to Chinese scientists from CRAES Institute in Beijing 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Opportunity to explain the latest approaches as used by our project in assessing the impacts of chemicals on the environment. Valuable exercise as the Chinese review and develop our own approaches.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019
 
Description Talk to Luxembourg Research Institute (LIST) 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Professional Practitioners
Results and Impact Opportunity to explain the latest approaches as used by our project in assessing the impacts of chemicals on the environment
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019