📣 Help Shape the Future of UKRI's Gateway to Research (GtR)

We're improving UKRI's Gateway to Research and are seeking your input! If you would be interested in being interviewed about the improvements we're making and to have your say about how we can make GtR more user-friendly, impactful, and effective for the Research and Innovation community, please email gateway@ukri.org.

Interpretive analysis of 85 systematic reviews suggests that narrative syntheses and meta-analyses are incommensurate in argumentation. (2017)

First Author: Melendez-Torres GJ

Attributed to: Meta-analysis, complexity and heterogeneity (MACH): methodological review and development of guidance funded by MRC

Abstract

No abstract provided

Bibliographic Information

Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1231

PubMed Identifier: 27860329

Publication URI: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27860329

Type: Journal Article/Review

Volume: 8

Parent Publication: Research synthesis methods

Issue: 1

ISSN: 1759-2879