Restoring Resilient Ecosystems (RestREco)
Lead Research Organisation:
CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY
Department Name: Engineering and Applied Science
Abstract
There is a global biodiversity crisis driven by mounting pressures including land degradation and climate change. Within the UK, responses include the Government's 25 Year Environment Plan, which sets out a vision to secure a more biodiverse, connected and resilient landscape. The Natural Capital Committee has argued for the need to secure Net Environmental Gains, and this is a provision of the upcoming Environment Bill. A recent report from the UK Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology highlights the needs to secure our natural capital, not just to support biodiversity, but also ensure the provision of wider ecosystem services. Questions remain, however, as to how we achieve net environmental gain; what should go where? What does success look like? How long may it take to reassemble resilient communities that can reliably deliver ecosystem services?
One widely adopted approach to securing net environmental gain is that of "ecological restoration". However, using specific natural and semi-natural ecosystems to define endpoints is increasingly contested, as target "pristine" states are hard to define, climate change is leading to a shifting baseline, and there is a need to restore ecosystems that are resilient to future pressures. We need a new paradigm for goal-seeking in ecological restoration which goes beyond reference systems, is agnostic as to prior assumptions of intactness, integrity and system "health", based on diagnostics of characteristics of functionally intact systems.
There is an aspiration across the devolved administrations to deliver net environmental gain in biodiversity across all land uses. However, the restoration of ecological communities has been led by practitioners, with relatively little evidence gathered as to how individual restoration projects link together spatially to enhance the resilience of communities. This consortium brings together leading academic ecologists with a public sector organisation and a charity at the forefront of practical restoration activities, to extract the evidence from past activities through a natural experiment, and test resilience through manipulations.
We intend to measure biodiversity, architecture and multifunctionality in ecosystems in different stages of transition from a degraded state, identify determinants and measures of complexity, and seek signals of emergent properties - especially resilience to perturbation. We have chosen grasslands and woodlands, being two major habitat types targeted for restoration programmes. Further to this we shall explore how approaches to accelerating re-integration of systems may affect emergent properties.
In summary, we propose to move restoration science forward, but considering complexity and resilience as fundamental aims for restoration projects, rather than attempting to re-create specific target ecosystems.
One widely adopted approach to securing net environmental gain is that of "ecological restoration". However, using specific natural and semi-natural ecosystems to define endpoints is increasingly contested, as target "pristine" states are hard to define, climate change is leading to a shifting baseline, and there is a need to restore ecosystems that are resilient to future pressures. We need a new paradigm for goal-seeking in ecological restoration which goes beyond reference systems, is agnostic as to prior assumptions of intactness, integrity and system "health", based on diagnostics of characteristics of functionally intact systems.
There is an aspiration across the devolved administrations to deliver net environmental gain in biodiversity across all land uses. However, the restoration of ecological communities has been led by practitioners, with relatively little evidence gathered as to how individual restoration projects link together spatially to enhance the resilience of communities. This consortium brings together leading academic ecologists with a public sector organisation and a charity at the forefront of practical restoration activities, to extract the evidence from past activities through a natural experiment, and test resilience through manipulations.
We intend to measure biodiversity, architecture and multifunctionality in ecosystems in different stages of transition from a degraded state, identify determinants and measures of complexity, and seek signals of emergent properties - especially resilience to perturbation. We have chosen grasslands and woodlands, being two major habitat types targeted for restoration programmes. Further to this we shall explore how approaches to accelerating re-integration of systems may affect emergent properties.
In summary, we propose to move restoration science forward, but considering complexity and resilience as fundamental aims for restoration projects, rather than attempting to re-create specific target ecosystems.
Organisations
- CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY (Lead Research Organisation)
- NATURAL ENGLAND (Project Partner)
- Knepp Castle Estate (Project Partner)
- Coal Authority (Project Partner)
- Tarmac (Project Partner)
- Woodland Trust (Project Partner)
- NatureScot (Project Partner)
- Plantlife International (Project Partner)
- The National Forest Company (Project Partner)
- FORESTRY COMMISSION (Project Partner)
Publications
Bullock J
(2021)
Future restoration should enhance ecological complexity and emergent properties at multiple scales
in Ecography
Conti L
(2023)
Functional trait trade-offs define plant population stability across different biomes.
in Proceedings. Biological sciences
Dong Z
(2025)
Species-habitat networks reveal conservation implications that other community analyses do not detect.
in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
Rillig M
(2024)
Moving restoration ecology forward with combinatorial approaches
Rillig MC
(2024)
Moving restoration ecology forward with combinatorial approaches.
in Global change biology
Toumasis N
(2024)
Emerging resilience metrics in an intensely managed ecological system
in Ecological Engineering
Waddell E
(2026)
Drivers of complexity in ecosystem restoration
in Journal of Applied Ecology
Woodcock B
(2026)
Restoration of ecological interactions: The influence of site and landscape factors
in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
| Description | We examined complexity in the context of restoration within two contrasting ecosystems, calcareous grasslands and broadleaved woodlands. Work to date has demonstrated that decisions made at the onset of restoration have a large role in the subsequent development of complexity, including grassland establishment method and former land-use for woodlands (Waddell et al. in press). High structural complexity was identified as a positive driver of invertebrate complexity in both habitats, but in general we observed limited causal relationships between the different complexity aspects. This study showed that ecological complexity is empirically measurable, and its development in restoration can be influenced by key variables, which have mechanistic underpinnings. The foundational role of structural complexity driving other aspects of complexity could guide management efforts to enhance ecological complexity. We also evaluated how restoration age, site size and landscape proximity to similar habitats impact the re-establishment of trophic linkages between empirically measured grassland plant-pollinator and woodland plant-herbivore networks (Woodcock et al. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.110060). For both grassland and woodlands, older and larger sites typically support higher levels of connectance, nestedness and generality of the networks. In contrast, landscape proximity promotes these metrics for woodland webs but has the reverse effect for grassland webs. The similarities show common characteristics of community trophic re-establishment in response to local environmental drivers for these different ecosystems. Focusing on interactions rather than species identity highlights opportunities for targeted policies to restore ecosystem function in wider agricultural landscapes; for example, through increasing site size as well as the need for continuity of older sites. Our results suggest that ecological complexity is multi-faceted and cannot be reduced to a few simple indicators. Thus, to gain a holistic understanding of how complex an ecosystem is, one needs to measure multiple aspects rather than focusing on, e.g., taxonomic diversity of a few taxa. One approach is to consider a syndrome-focussed framework, whereby a set of complexity measures provides a good indication of ecosystems status and resilience. We have investigated the increasing complexity of areas managed for woodland or grassland after the cessation of either intensive agriculture or mineral extraction, using a "chronosequence" of sites representing different ages since restoration begun. We are still analysing results, but it is becoming clear that initial decisions made (e.g. type and arrangement of tree planting) have a major role in determining the re-establishment of biodiversity and ecosystem function, and have demonstrating ways in which we can reliably measure ecosystem complexity, with the aim of improving the way we establish and manage restoration in the future to secure their resilience. |
| Exploitation Route | The emerging results of this work will be used to inform decisions and management of restoration sites and delivering Nature Recovery and Security. The insights arising from the work of the project are reframing the ways in which the conservation and restoration of Natural Capital an its resilience can be established, monitored and and managed. It challenges the concept of going back in time for our restoration targets, in the context of a rapidly changing climate and land use. |
| Sectors | Aerospace Defence and Marine Agriculture Food and Drink Environment Leisure Activities including Sports Recreation and Tourism Security and Diplomacy |
| Description | The work of this project has been influencing opinion through several channels - BES Annual Conferences, a Special Issue of the Environmental Scientist, and Keynote talks at Natural England, The National Trust, and the Chartered Institute for Ecology and Environmental Management. The narrative around the central premise that we are going to learn more about the state of systems, and provide unambiguous measurement of restoration success, by looking for emergent properties is fuelling debate and discussion amongst policy makers - and is feeding into the development of UKRI programmes. |
| First Year Of Impact | 2022 |
| Sector | Agriculture, Food and Drink,Environment,Security and Diplomacy |
| Impact Types | Policy & public services |
| Title | Acoustic monitoring data from woodland, grassland and rewilding sites in Scotland and England, 2021-2022 |
| Description | This data gives acoustic index values for recordings collected in 60 broadleaved woodland restoration sites in Central Scotland (n=30) and the English Midlands (n=30), as well as 18 grassland sites in southern England. Additionally, there are recordings from 6 wildcard sites, made up of ancient woodlands (2 in Scotland and 2 in England) and rewilding sites (2 in England). There were three deployments of acoustic recorders between July 2021 and April 2022. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2025 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| URL | https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/33b6dea2-94c5-4e33-a1b3-9a6bd1c8776a |
| Title | Data from: Species-habitat networks reveal conservation implications that other community analyses do not detect |
| Description | Grassland restoration is an important conservation intervention supporting declining insect pollinators, particularly in threatened calcareous grassland landscapes. While restoration is often assessed using simple diversity or the similarity to a target community metrics, this can fail to represent key aspects of community reconstruction. Here, we compare a new method, species-habitat networks, with techniques previously relied upon to understand the process of pollinator community restoration. The species-habitat network approach reveals details relevant to insect conservation that are not visible using standard measures of species richness, abundance, community similarity or network metrics. For instance, a shared set of butterflies and bumblebees found in ancient extensively managed grassland, the target community for restoration, were more likely to inhabit previously disturbed grassland than recently disturbed or reverting grasslands. We propose that species-habitat networks should be part of the standard analytical toolkit assessing the effectiveness of restoration, particularly for mobile species such as insects. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2023 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| URL | https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.73n5tb33c |
| Title | Insect, plant and tree data from woodland restoration sites in Central Scotland, 2021 and English Midlands, 2022 |
| Description | In 2021 and 2022 a total of 60 broadleaved woodland restoration sites from Central Scotland (2021) and English Midlands (2022) and a further six wildcard sites made up of ancient woodlands (2 in Scotland and 2 in England) and rewilding sites (2 in England) were surveyed to calculate metrics of ecological complexity from biodiversity and habitat structure data. In each woodland, we monitored ground flora (surveyed using quadrats), adult trees (within circular plots), tree seedlings and saplings (transects), volume of deadwood (measured within transects), canopy cover estimations, invertebrates on understorey vegetation (surveyed by tray beating) and (mostly) flying invertebrates (surveyed using Malaise traps). Information on site characteristics were collected, including age of the restoration site, former land-use and features of the surrounding landscape. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2025 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| URL | https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8c997943-1f90-4897-87b3-491eaef534ec |
| Title | Table S2 Datasets information.xlsx from Functional traits trade-offs define plant population stability across different biomes |
| Description | Ecological theory posits that temporal stability patterns in plant populations are associated with differences in species' ecological strategies. However, empirical evidence is lacking about which traits, or trade-offs, underlie species stability, especially across different biomes. We compiled a worldwide collection of long-term permanent vegetation records (greater than 7000 plots from 78 datasets) from a large range of habitats which we combined with existing trait databases. We tested whether the observed inter-annual variability in species abundance (coefficient of variation) was related to multiple individual traits. We found that populations with greater leaf dry matter content and seed mass were more stable over time. Despite the variability explained by these traits being low, their effect was consistent across different datasets. Other traits played a significant, albeit weaker, role in species stability, and the inclusion of multi-variate axes or phylogeny did not substantially modify nor improve predictions. These results provide empirical evidence and highlight the relevance of specific ecological trade-offs, i.e. in different resource-use and dispersal strategies, for plant populations stability across multiple biomes. Further research is, however, necessary to integrate and evaluate the role of other specific traits, often not available in databases, and intraspecific trait variability in modulating species stability. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2023 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| URL | https://rs.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_S2_Datasets_information_xlsx_from_Functional_traits_t... |
| Title | Table S3 Traits information.xlsx from Functional traits trade-offs define plant population stability across different biomes |
| Description | Ecological theory posits that temporal stability patterns in plant populations are associated with differences in species' ecological strategies. However, empirical evidence is lacking about which traits, or trade-offs, underlie species stability, especially across different biomes. We compiled a worldwide collection of long-term permanent vegetation records (greater than 7000 plots from 78 datasets) from a large range of habitats which we combined with existing trait databases. We tested whether the observed inter-annual variability in species abundance (coefficient of variation) was related to multiple individual traits. We found that populations with greater leaf dry matter content and seed mass were more stable over time. Despite the variability explained by these traits being low, their effect was consistent across different datasets. Other traits played a significant, albeit weaker, role in species stability, and the inclusion of multi-variate axes or phylogeny did not substantially modify nor improve predictions. These results provide empirical evidence and highlight the relevance of specific ecological trade-offs, i.e. in different resource-use and dispersal strategies, for plant populations stability across multiple biomes. Further research is, however, necessary to integrate and evaluate the role of other specific traits, often not available in databases, and intraspecific trait variability in modulating species stability. |
| Type Of Material | Database/Collection of data |
| Year Produced | 2023 |
| Provided To Others? | Yes |
| URL | https://rs.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_S3_Traits_information_xlsx_from_Functional_traits_tra... |
| Description | National Trust Advisory Groups Conference, Birmingham |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Third sector organisations |
| Results and Impact | PI Harris was asked to present a brief "provocation" to National Trust Staff, Volunteers and Supporters to challenge thinking about conservation activities within the Trust Regarding conservation and restoration in the face of climate change. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Natural England Science Conference |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | Talk at the Natural England Science conference on how the work in the present study can inform the notion of "restoring forwards" and understanding that current practices focussed on "this organism in this place" will need to flex to a "same play, different actors" approach to secure and enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functions in a rapidly changing planet. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Talk and Q&A delivered |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Local |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A talk followed by Q&A to Bedford Borough Council Climate Change Committee September the 23rd 2024: Local to Global: The science and co-benefits of urban biodiversity in a changing environment. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://councillorsupport.bedford.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=45745 |
| Description | Talk delivered to a Government Department Group |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Policymakers/politicians |
| Results and Impact | A talk and debate delivered to a group of Defra Civil Servants. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| Description | Talk delivered to a Professional Organisation |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Over 100 people attended online to a a series of talks organised by the Biological Recording Company, 12th November 2024, followed by a Q&A session. |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2024 |
| URL | https://biologicalrecording.co.uk/2024/11/12/climate-change/ |
| Description | Talk given at the Charted Institute for Ecology and Environmental Management |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Talk entitled "Conservation and restoration in a changing climate - complexity, resilience and restoring forwards" at the CIEEM 2023 Autumn Conferences 22nd-23rd November 2023 "MODERNISING ECOLOGY - TECHNIQUES AND APPROACHES" |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| URL | http://events.cieem.net/Events/EventPages/22112023000000CIEEM2023AutumnConferenceModernisingEcologyT... |
| Description | Talk to Oxford University AGLE Initiative stakeholder group |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | Regional |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Talk to AGILE Sprint on Nature based Solutions on how to assess biodiversity outcomes, to inform their monitoring framework |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Talk to Suffolk Naturalists Trust Rewilding meeting |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | A talk or presentation |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
| Results and Impact | Talk on reconciling restoration with rewilding to a broad audience of conservation practitioners |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2023 |
| Description | Thematic session "Is complexity important for ecosystem restoration" within the British Ecological Society conference |
| Form Of Engagement Activity | Participation in an activity, workshop or similar |
| Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
| Geographic Reach | National |
| Primary Audience | Other audiences |
| Results and Impact | Members of the RestREco team proposed the thematic session for the 2022 BES conference, and this was selected. Summary of the session: This thematic session will bring together practitioners, academics and policy for a suite of talks on landscape restoration, unified by the overarching vision of the decreasing importance of past baselines and the shift to a paradigm of ecological complexity as a future baseline. Nb - a key audience for this event was academics, but this is not listed as an option above |
| Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2022 |
