How does language experience support language development? Short-term priming and long-term learning.

Lead Research Organisation: University of Warwick
Department Name: Psychology

Abstract

How we learn and use language is, not surprisingly, related to the language we experience around us: ultimately children who are exposed to English learn English, but more specifically, research shows that children exposed to varied language input (wider vocabularies, diverse sentences) come to develop more extensive language skills than those with narrower input. While we know that children's experience with language is important for shaping their learning of language, it remains unclear precisely how our experience with language influences our language development: what aspects of language experience are important, and how do children make use of them? Our project investigates how children learn from their language experiences, and the underlying learning mechanisms that they use to do so. Understanding the mechanisms that support language learning is theoretically important, because it informs our understanding of a uniquely human ability. But it also has substantial societal implications, because successful language development is critical to later educational and social attainment.

Our project focuses on how language experience affects children's use of particular grammatical or "syntactic" structures - the way words are ordered in a sentence. We know that one way in which both children and adults make use of the language they experience is by re-using it. This re-use occurs not just for specific words (e.g., saying 'sofa' instead of 'settee' because that's what your friend just called it), but also at more abstract levels, including grammar. For instance, you are more likely to say "those pictures were drawn by Quentin Blake" after hearing someone say "this book was written by Roald Dahl". This grammatical repetition is known as "syntactic priming": hearing a word order makes it easier for you to re-use that order, even with different words. When a speaker repeats a structure they have been exposed to, it indicates that they have a mental representation for that structure that they can use when understanding a sentence, and then re-use when planning a new sentence to say. So patterns of syntactic priming effects in children provide evidence about which grammatical structures they know.

More recent research suggests that the influence of such priming lasts longer than the immediate context. In fact, recent models of language processing propose that priming can lead to long-term learning, so that when someone experiences a grammatical structure, it sets in train a persistent change in their language representations. For example, when a child hears "this book was written by Roald Dahl", it does not just help them to re-use that structure immediately, it also strengthens their knowledge of that structure. But it is unclear how this learning occurs: how does children's immediate experience with language translate into longer-term development of adult-like representations? In this research we will conduct psycholinguistic experiments with children at different stages of language development in which we vary which types of structure children hear and say, in different contexts and at different time points. We will examine how likely they are to re-use these structures and how long-lasting such effects are, in order to cast light on the way in which children can learn from different elements of the language they experience. We will address the following questions: When in language development is this type of experience important? To what extent is experience-based learning linked to specific contexts, whether linguistic (experience of particular words) or non-linguistic (experience within a particular conversation or task), and to what extent does it generalise? Does learning occur to the same extent through the act of hearing different word orders and the act of saying them? Answering these questions will ultimately help us understand the mechanisms, conditions and trajectories underlying successful language development.

Planned Impact

In addition to the scientific impact and impact on the post-doctoral researcher's career progression outlined in the Academic Beneficiaries section, these findings will have societal impact (1), being immediately relevant to those involved in supporting children's language learning, such as education practitioners and early years staff, and parents of young children. This project will also develop research capacity (2).

(1) Societal impact: Although the focus of this research is scientific, the findings of this project have the potential for societal impact and we therefore plan to include a variety of activities to achieve this (see Pathways to Impact document). Our research seeks to further our understanding of how the immediate interactions that children have with adults have a long-term effect on their language development. Recent reports highlight that good language and communication skills at young ages predict children's educational outcomes in the long-term [publication list:36,37] and pave the way for literacy [38]. With 20% of children not attaining the expected levels of language development by the end of the Foundation Stage of education [8], it is therefore particularly important to understand how language experience supports early language development, and to communicate these findings with early years staff who provide a substantial portion of early language input for many children. Our findings may help to inform how caregivers and practitioners can interact with young children in a way that is beneficial to their language development, particularly in the area of developing syntax, which may in turn ensure that they achieve the important foundations of language and communication that support their later education. For example, we predict that children who regularly hear complex syntactic structures will better understand these structures, and that children who regularly have opportunities to use these complex syntactic structures themselves will more quickly consolidate this understanding and the ability to use it. Such findings would lead to recommendations for early years staff to include more complex language when interacting with young children and to create opportunities for children to repeat it.

(2) Research capacity: The academic community will benefit from the development of research capacity that this project will create. It will employ three members of staff who will receive substantial training in experimental methodology and experience in data collection and management, increasing their research skills. In particular, offering the PGRA and Project Assistant positions on a part-time basis will make available the possibility of gaining valuable research experience to a range of people who normally have limited access to such opportunities. Notably, the Project Assistant will be employed on a part-time basis compatible with school hours which may provide a particularly beneficial opportunity for a parent or caregiver to return to work and gain research experience which may support the development of a research-related career. It will also develop research capacity in both the Warwickshire and Edinburgh local communities by developing the databases of families willing to participate in research for both sites' research laboratories and by strengthening links to local schools and nurseries willing to participate in research, which will support future research with these communities. Lastly, in actively communicating our research the broader society, the PI, CO-I, PDRA and PGRA will gain experience and training in knowledge exchange and communicating research to non-academic audiences, supporting future impact activities.
 
Description Children can learn to produce language by hearing other people speak and reusing these words and sentence structures in their own speech. To determine how to best support children's language development, it is critical to assess the range of contexts that facilitate their tendency to learn from a conversational partner's speech. This issue is particularly timely given children's increasing participation in online interactions, especially in response to the Covid19 pandemic. While children can learn single words from live online interactions, our study is the first to investigate whether they can learn grammar in such contexts. We demonstrate that three- and five-year-olds learn sentence structures from an adult's language input via both video+audio and audio-only online interactions, thus providing deeper insight into how children can learn language in a variety of everyday settings. Our study also demonstrates how online methodologies can be effectively applied to developmental language production research.
Exploitation Route These findings are informative for parents, teachers and speech and language therapists. They can be used to inform how we interact with children in ways that best supports their language development.
Sectors Education

 
Description Blog post 
Form Of Engagement Activity A magazine, newsletter or online publication
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact A blog post describing results from one of our project studies was written for a general audience and published on the LuCiD (ESRC International Centre for Language and Communicative Development) blog pages.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
URL http://lucid.ac.uk/seminars-news-events-blog/blogs/now-you-see-me-now-you-don-t-can-children-learn-l...
 
Description Language Learning Through Communicative Interaction Symposium 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach International
Primary Audience Other audiences
Results and Impact A free online symposium was held to bring together researchers with a common interest in language learning through communicative interaction in typical and autistic development to share research from a range of perspectives and to discuss emerging themes.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2021
URL https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/leadproject/language-learning-through-communicative-interaction/
 
Description Stakeholder webinar 
Form Of Engagement Activity A talk or presentation
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach National
Primary Audience Public/other audiences
Results and Impact About 20 attendees joined an online webinar on Supporting language development through life: Research & Tips - co-hosted with the University of Sussex and University of Edinburgh. Presentations of findings from this grant and another were given and questions were taken from the audience. Participants (5 completed the online feedback form) rated the usefulness of the webinar very highly (4.8/5) and stated they would be very likely to use the information in their practice (4.4/5). They reported finding the method of the research interesting and something that could be adopted in teaching or therapeutic practice.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2023
URL https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/supporting-language-development-through-life-research-and-tips-ticket...
 
Description Stakeholder workshop 
Form Of Engagement Activity Participation in an activity, workshop or similar
Part Of Official Scheme? No
Geographic Reach Local
Primary Audience Schools
Results and Impact Two workshops were held, one in each grant team location (Warwickshire, Edinburgh). The format and content of the workshops was the same in each location therefore we have compiled the feedback from the two together. 6 people attended the workshop at Warwick and 5 attended the workshop at Edinburgh.

Attendees were: Teaching fellow in Early Years Education (3), Early Years Practitioners (5), Speech & Language Therapist (1), Educational Psychologist (2).

Each workshop began with three presentations introducing the research project and the theories behind the research, the methodology of syntactic priming that the project focusses on understanding, methods of communication of our research. This was followed by a round table discussion of these issues and any other issues raised by participants.

We collected feedback from the events. Participants enjoyed the workshop - they rated it 4.9/5 for enjoyment. In particular, they liked hearing about the research, the conversation and discussion, and the informative but friendly/informal environment, the variety of opinions aired and the timing of the different elements. Participants picked up the messages about the phenomena under study. This suggests that the workshop was well-pitched for our target audience.

Participants rated the presentations as interesting (average rating 4.8/5) and commented on the general interest in discovering more about what research is being done and how. They also suggested a wide variety of audiences who would be interested in the research: parents/carers; child care/nursery managers/practitioners/early years settings; headteachers; children's centres; heads of service; Coventry Early Years group/Early Years Team at City of Edinburgh Council; newly qualified teachers; students on childhood qualifications; SLT teams; Educational Psychologists. This suggests the work is perceived as being of interest and widely relevant to the public and education sector.

Participants indicated that they would be very likely to follow the research (average rating 4.8/5). They cited a number of sources they would use to follow it: website and website alerts, twitter, newsletters, emails, research briefings and articles, indicating that it is important for us to publicise information in these ways. During the discussion participants made useful recommendations about specific sector-based publications and groups that would be relevant audiences for our findings. We will use this feedback when we have results to disseminate to inform our dissemination plans and to ensure we reach our target audiences.

In terms of the more direct impact of the research, participants indicated that they would be quite likely to put what they learnt at the workshop into practice (average rating 4.4/5), either by informing colleagues of the ideas and using it in teaching or training with education staff and by referring to the research in their own work, or more practically, by considering their own language use when interacting with children and trying to manipulate their language choices, by using priming when looking at books. This is a point that should be followed-up in future public engagement activities: participants picked up the message that varying their language use when interacting with children is of benefit to their language development from our presentations of the general research programme. In the future, this message could be more directly delivered and shaped into specific recommendations or concrete examples to help stakeholders make use of the research outcomes.

The event was not designed as a networking event, however participants' rated it as quite useful as a networking opportunity (average rating 4.4/5). Participants considered the workshop a useful opportunity to hear other practitioners' views, reflect on practices, and hear about research. One participant commented on the small number of attendees. Given the general positive feedback about the event we should try to increase the attendance at future workshops. This would increase the reach of the messages as well as pooling more opinions and ideas. One action would be to consider the timing of such events.

An additional significant outcome, in addition to the audience reporting changes in views/opinions/behaviours, is that we have managed to arrange participation in the research with some of the nursery leaders who attended.
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity 2019