Understanding the dynamics and drivers of the COVID-2019 epidemic using real-time outbreak analytics
Lead Research Organisation:
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Department Name: UNLISTED
Abstract
Tracking and predicting an epidemic can help tailor public health measures so that we
respond quickly and appropriately to evolving threats. We will fit statistical models to
emerging data to monitor key epidemiological and clinical parameters related to
transmissibility and severity, and their likely impact on health services. Mathematical
models will be fitted to surveillance data to forecast future cases and hospitalisations and
evaluate the impact of different public health policies. Importantly, we will also measure
people’s behaviour over time to detect changes in response to the epidemic, assessing
what measures they take to reduce risk and where they get their evidence from. This
information will be used to refine our models and improve epidemiological forecasting. It
will also allow public health authorities to tailor their messaging to ensure that people
respond appropriately to changes in risk. The information that we generate, either from
our analyses of the emerging data, epidemic forecasts, or from our panel of respondents,
will be rapidly summarised and shared on easy-to-use websites so that scientists, health
workers and the public can be best informed about the threats posed by COVID-19 and
the efficacy of different measures to reduce risk.
respond quickly and appropriately to evolving threats. We will fit statistical models to
emerging data to monitor key epidemiological and clinical parameters related to
transmissibility and severity, and their likely impact on health services. Mathematical
models will be fitted to surveillance data to forecast future cases and hospitalisations and
evaluate the impact of different public health policies. Importantly, we will also measure
people’s behaviour over time to detect changes in response to the epidemic, assessing
what measures they take to reduce risk and where they get their evidence from. This
information will be used to refine our models and improve epidemiological forecasting. It
will also allow public health authorities to tailor their messaging to ensure that people
respond appropriately to changes in risk. The information that we generate, either from
our analyses of the emerging data, epidemic forecasts, or from our panel of respondents,
will be rapidly summarised and shared on easy-to-use websites so that scientists, health
workers and the public can be best informed about the threats posed by COVID-19 and
the efficacy of different measures to reduce risk.
Technical Summary
This COVID-19 Rapid Response award is jointly funded (50:50) between the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research. The figure displayed is the total award amount of the two funders combined, with each partner contributing equally towards the project.
Efficient response to COVID-19 requires an understanding of the epidemiological and
behavioural drivers of disease transmission. Due to the rapidly evolving outbreak and the
mitigation strategies likely to be put in place at different times, analyses of epidemic
drivers and policy evaluation need constant updating to provide relevant data-driven
evidence to inform evolving public health choices.
We will provide rapid, continually updated estimates of key epidemiological features such
as disease severity and transmissibility measures and lengths of stay. Surveillance,
serological and sequence data (where available) will be analysed accounting for censoring
and reporting delays. Mathematical models will be fit to the emerging data streams using
Bayesian methods to provide regular forecasting updates and assess the impact of
current or potential future interventions. Contact and precautionary behaviours will be
monitored in a representative cohort along with information on risk awareness and
perceived efficacy of interventions to refine transmission models, improve forecasting, and
assess the effectiveness of social distancing measures.
Special attention will be given to sharing results in an open and timely manner.
Epidemiological parameter estimates and forecasts will be shared on a public website,
updated daily. User-friendly web interfaces will allow users to generate model outputs and
investigate the impact of specific model assumptions on different policy findings.
Highlights of essential results will be gathered in short policy briefs updated weekly.
Findings will immediately inform UK policy through participation on UK Government
advisory committees.
Efficient response to COVID-19 requires an understanding of the epidemiological and
behavioural drivers of disease transmission. Due to the rapidly evolving outbreak and the
mitigation strategies likely to be put in place at different times, analyses of epidemic
drivers and policy evaluation need constant updating to provide relevant data-driven
evidence to inform evolving public health choices.
We will provide rapid, continually updated estimates of key epidemiological features such
as disease severity and transmissibility measures and lengths of stay. Surveillance,
serological and sequence data (where available) will be analysed accounting for censoring
and reporting delays. Mathematical models will be fit to the emerging data streams using
Bayesian methods to provide regular forecasting updates and assess the impact of
current or potential future interventions. Contact and precautionary behaviours will be
monitored in a representative cohort along with information on risk awareness and
perceived efficacy of interventions to refine transmission models, improve forecasting, and
assess the effectiveness of social distancing measures.
Special attention will be given to sharing results in an open and timely manner.
Epidemiological parameter estimates and forecasts will be shared on a public website,
updated daily. User-friendly web interfaces will allow users to generate model outputs and
investigate the impact of specific model assumptions on different policy findings.
Highlights of essential results will be gathered in short policy briefs updated weekly.
Findings will immediately inform UK policy through participation on UK Government
advisory committees.
People |
ORCID iD |
John Edmunds (Principal Investigator) |
Publications
Abbas K
(2020)
Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit-risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
in The Lancet. Global health
Van Zandvoort K
(2020)
Response strategies for COVID-19 epidemics in African settings: a mathematical modelling study.
in BMC medicine
Kucharski AJ
(2020)
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.
in The Lancet. Infectious diseases
Davies NG
(2020)
Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics.
in Nature medicine
Leng T
(2020)
The effectiveness of social bubbles as part of a Covid-19 lockdown exit strategy, a modelling study.
in Wellcome open research
Gibbs H
(2020)
Changing travel patterns in China during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
in Nature communications
Russell TW
(2020)
Reconstructing the early global dynamics of under-ascertained COVID-19 cases and infections.
in BMC medicine
Quaife M
(2020)
The impact of COVID-19 control measures on social contacts and transmission in Kenyan informal settlements.
in BMC medicine
Davies NG
(2020)
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.
in The Lancet. Public health
Edmunds WJ
(2020)
Finding a path to reopen schools during the COVID-19 pandemic.
in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health
Mathur R
(2020)
Urgent actions and policies needed to address COVID-19 among UK ethnic minorities.
in Lancet (London, England)
Endo A
(2020)
Implication of backward contact tracing in the presence of overdispersed transmission in COVID-19 outbreaks.
in Wellcome open research
Clark A
(2020)
Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: a modelling study.
in The Lancet. Global health
Leclerc QJ
(2020)
What settings have been linked to SARS-CoV-2 transmission clusters?
in Wellcome open research
Abbas M
(2021)
Explosive nosocomial outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in a rehabilitation clinic: the limits of genomics for outbreak reconstruction.
in The Journal of hospital infection
Gibbs H
(2021)
Detecting behavioural changes in human movement to inform the spatial scale of interventions against COVID-19.
in PLoS computational biology
Abbas M
(2021)
Explosive Nosocomial Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in a Rehabilitation Clinic: The Limits of Genomics for Outbreak Reconstruction
in SSRN Electronic Journal
Description | The work covered in this award has been critical in influencing UK and other policy decisions related to COVID-19. I do not have the time to list all of them, but I and various other members of the team are members of SPI-M (the modelling subgroup that feeds into SAGE). The work contained here has been presented at numerous SPI-M meetings over the last year. I am also a member of SAGE and much of the work contained here has directly informed SAGE. |
Geographic Reach | National |
Policy Influence Type | Implementation circular/rapid advice/letter to e.g. Ministry of Health |
Impact | As above, the work generated by this award has had a direct influence on SAGE (Strategic Advisory Group for Emergencies) through my presentation of the work there, or through SPI-M (the modelling subgroup of SAGE). I and/or my co-investigators present at SPI-M every week. |
URL | https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/scientific-evidence-supporting-the-government-response-to-... |
Description | Presentation and attendance of key COVID-19 scientific advisory bodies, including SAGE, SPI-M, and NERVTAG |
Form Of Engagement Activity | A formal working group, expert panel or dialogue |
Part Of Official Scheme? | No |
Geographic Reach | National |
Primary Audience | Professional Practitioners |
Results and Impact | There have been over 100 SAGE meetings, over 100 SPI-M meetings and over 60 NERVTAG meetings over the course of the pandemic. Professor Edmunds has attended almost all of these meetings, and has been joined at SPI-M by the other co-applicants on this grant. In doing this, the work conducted as a consquence of this grant has directly helped inform government policy over the 2 years of the pandemic. |
Year(s) Of Engagement Activity | 2020,2021,2022 |
URL | https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/scientific-evidence-supporting-the-government-response-to-... |